Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076252›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2016

A Clinical Aid for Detecting Skin Cancer: The Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA).

T Rogers, M L Marino, S W Dusza, S Bajaj, R P Usatine, M A Marchetti, A A Marghoob

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Educational Interventions to Support Primary Care Provider Performance of Diagnostic Skin Cancer Examinations: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Expert Consensus Statement on Proficiency Standards for Dermoscopy Education in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dermoscopy Features of Cutaneous Warts.International journal of general medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dermoscopy use in UK primary care: a survey of GPs with a special interest in dermatology.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T RogersFrom the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (TR, MLM, SWD, SB, MAM, AAM); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RPU).
M L MarinoFrom the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (TR, MLM, SWD, SB, MAM, AAM); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RPU).
S W DuszaFrom the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (TR, MLM, SWD, SB, MAM, AAM); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RPU).
S BajajFrom the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (TR, MLM, SWD, SB, MAM, AAM); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RPU).
R P UsatineFrom the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (TR, MLM, SWD, SB, MAM, AAM); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RPU).
M A MarchettiFrom the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (TR, MLM, SWD, SB, MAM, AAM); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RPU).
A A MarghoobFrom the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (TR, MLM, SWD, SB, MAM, AAM); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RPU).
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFamily physicians (FPs) frequently evaluate skin lesions but may not have the necessary training to accurately and confidently identify lesions that require skin biopsy or specialist referral. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a new, simplified dermoscopy algorithm for skin cancer detection.

methodsIn this cross-sectional, observation study, attendees of a dermoscopy course evaluated 50 polarized dermoscopy images of skin lesions (27 malignant and 23 benign) using the Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA). The dermoscopic criteria of TADA include architectural disorder (ie, disorganized or asymmetric distribution of colors and/or structures), starburst pattern, blue-black or gray color, white structures, negative network, ulcer, and vessels. The study occurred after 1 day of basic dermoscopy training. Clinical information related to palpation (ie, firm, dimpling) was provided when relevant.

resultsOf 200 course attendees, 120 (60%) participated in the study. Participants included 64 (53.3%) dermatologists and 41 (34.2%) primary care physicians, 19 (46.3%) of whom were FPs. Fifty-two (43%) individuals had no previous dermoscopy training. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of TADA for malignant skin lesions was 94.8% and 72.3%, respectively. Previous dermoscopy training and years of dermoscopy experience were not associated with diagnostic sensitivity (P = .13 and P = .05, respectively) or specificity (P = .36 and P = .21, respectively). Specialty type was not associated with sensitivity (P = .37) but dermatologists had a higher specificity than nondermatologists (79% v. 72%, P = .008).

conclusionsAfter basic instruction, TADA may be a useful dermoscopy algorithm for FPs who examine skin lesions as it has a high sensitivity for detecting skin cancer.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBasal Cell CarcinomaBiopsyCarcinoma, Squamous CellCross-Sectional StudiesDermatologistsDermoscopyDiagnosis, DifferentialFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPalpationPhysicians, FamilyAlgorithmsBiopsyCross-sectional StudiesDermoscopyFamilyPalpationPhysiciansReferral and ConsultationSensitivity and SpecificitySkin NeoplasmsTriage

Identifiers

PMID28076252
PMCPMC5536949
OpenAlexW2555687100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.