Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28075655›Full record

SynthesisJournal of adolescent and young adult oncology2017

Experiences and Preferences for End-of-Life Care for Young Adults with Cancer and Their Informal Carers: A Narrative Synthesis.

Nothando Ngwenya, Charlotte Kenten, Louise Jones, Faith Gibson, Susie Pearce, Mary Flatley, Rachael Hough, L Caroline Stirling, Rachel M Taylor, Geoff Wong and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Parental views on communication between children and clinicians in pediatric oncology: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Yoga for Young Adults With Noncurative Cancer: A Brief Report.Global advances in health and medicine · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nothando Ngwenya1 Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, University College Hospital , London, United Kingdom .
Charlotte Kenten1 Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, University College Hospital , London, United Kingdom .
Louise Jones2 Division of Psychiatry, Palliative Care Research Department, University College London , London, United Kingdom .
Faith Gibson3 Centre for Outcomes and Experiences Research in Children's Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust , London, United Kingdom .
Susie Pearce5 Department of Oncology, University College Hospital , London, United Kingdom .
Mary Flatley6 St. Joseph Hospice , London, United Kingdom .
Rachael Hough7 Children and Young Peoples Cancer Service, University College Hospital , London, United Kingdom .
L Caroline Stirling8 Camden, Islington ELiPSe and UCLH & HCA Palliative Care Service, Central and North West London NHS Trust , London, United Kingdom .
Rachel M Taylor5 Department of Oncology, University College Hospital , London, United Kingdom .
Geoff Wong9 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom .
Jeremy Whelan5 Department of Oncology, University College Hospital , London, United Kingdom .

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1209-10013Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-UMarie Curie MCCC-RP-13-A15722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To review the qualitative literature on experiences of and preferences for end-of-life care of people with cancer aged 16-40 years (young adults) and their informal carers. A systematic review using narrative synthesis of qualitative studies using the 2006 UK Economic and Social Research Council research methods program guidance. Seven electronic bibliographic databases, two clinical trials databases, and three relevant theses databases were searched from January 2004 to October 2015. Eighteen articles were included from twelve countries. The selected studies included at least 5% of their patient sample within the age range 16-40 years. The studies were heterogeneous in their aims, focus, and sample, but described different aspects of end-of-life care for people with cancer. Positive experiences included facilitating adaptive coping and receiving palliative home care, while negative experiences were loss of "self" and nonfacilitative services and environment. Preferences included a family-centered approach to care, honest conversations about end of life, and facilitating normality. There is little evidence focused on the end-of-life needs of young adults. Analysis of reports including some young adults does not explore experience or preferences by age; therefore, it is difficult to identify age-specific issues clearly. From this review, we suggest that supportive interventions and education are needed to facilitate open and honest communication at an appropriate level with young people. Future research should focus on age-specific evidence about the end-of-life experiences and preferences for young adults with cancer and their informal carers.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunicationFamilyHome Care ServicesPalliative CarePatient PreferenceTerminal CareAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultHumansNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchYoung Adultend-of-life carenarrative synthesispalliative carequalitativesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28075655
PMCPMC5467142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.