Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28075510›Full record

ArticleBJU international2017

Development of a voided urine assay for detecting prostate cancer non-invasively: a pilot study.

Edouard J Trabulsi, Sushil K Tripathi, Leonard Gomella, Charalambos Solomides, Eric Wickstrom, Mathew L Thakur

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Detection of bladder cancer using voided urine sample and by targeting genomic VPAC receptors.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edouard J TrabulsiDepartment of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sushil K TripathiDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Leonard GomellaDepartment of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Charalambos SolomidesDepartments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eric WickstromDepartment of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mathew L ThakurDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University · USSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · US

Funding

VPAC1 Recpetor-Targeted PET Imaging of Prostate CancerR01CA157372 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI THAKUR, MATHEW LAXMAN · 2012 to 2017
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate a hypothesis that prostate cancer can be detected non-invasively by a simple and reliable assay by targeting genomic VPAC receptors expressed on malignant prostate cancer cells shed in voided urine. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS AND

methodsVPAC receptors were targeted with a specific biomolecule, TP4303, developed in our laboratory. With an Institutional Review Board exempt approval of use of de-identified discarded samples, an aliquot of urine collected as a standard of care, from patients presenting to the urology clinic (207 patients, 176 men and 31 women, aged ≥21 years) was cytospun. The cells were fixed and treated with TP4303 and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The cells were then observed under a microscope and cells with TP4303 orange fluorescence around the blue (DAPI) nucleus were considered 'malignant' and those only with a blue nucleus were regarded as 'normal'. VPAC presence was validated using receptor blocking assay and cell malignancy was confirmed by prostate cancer gene profile examination.

resultsThe urine specimens were labelled only with gender and presenting diagnosis, with no personal health identifiers or other clinical data. The assay detected VPAC positive cells in 98.6% of the men with a prostate cancer diagnosis (141), and none of the 10 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Of the 56 'normal' patients, 62.5% (35 patients, 10 men and 25 women) were negative for VPAC cells; 19.6% (11, 11 men and no women) had VPAC positive cells; and 17.8% (10, four men and six women) were uninterpretable due to excessive crystals in the urine. Although data are limited, the sensitivity of the assay was 99.3% with a confidence interval (CI) of 96.1-100% and the specificity was 100% with a CI of 69.2-100%. Receptor blocking assay and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses demonstrated the presence of VPAC receptors and gene profiling examinations confirmed that the cells expressing VPAC receptors were malignant prostate cancer cells.

conclusionThese preliminary data are highly encouraging and warrant further evaluation of the assay to serve as a simple and reliable tool to detect prostate cancer non-invasively.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, Type IUrinalysisYoung AdultReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, Type Iimaging prostate canceroptical imaging#PCSM#ProstateCancertargeting VPAC receptorsurinary assay

Identifiers

PMID28075510
PMCPMC5444967
OpenAlexW2575984490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.