Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28075395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Disability Weights for Chronic Mercury Intoxication Resulting from Gold Mining Activities: Results from an Online Pairwise Comparisons Survey.

Nadine Steckling, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Julia Winkelnkemper, Florian Fischer, Bret Ericson, Alexander Krämer, Claudia Hornberg, Richard Fuller, Dietrich Plass, Stephan Bose-O'Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nadine StecklingUnit Paediatric Environmental Epidemiology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Occupational Health, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich 80336, Germany. nadine.steckling@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Brecht DevleesschauwerDepartment of Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health (WIV-ISP), Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, Brussels 1050, Belgium. brechtdv@gmail.com.
Julia WinkelnkemperDepartment of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany. julia.winkelnkemper@uni-bielefeld.de.
Florian FischerDepartment of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany. f.fischer@uni-bielefeld.de.
Bret EricsonPure Earth, Formerly Blacksmith Institute, 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 860, New York, NY 10115, USA. bret@pureearth.org.
Alexander KrämerDepartment of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany. alexander.kraemer@uni-bielefeld.de.
Claudia HornbergDepartment of Environment & Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany. claudia.hornberg@uni-bielefeld.de.
Richard FullerPure Earth, Formerly Blacksmith Institute, 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 860, New York, NY 10115, USA. fuller@pureearth.org.
Dietrich PlassSection Exposure Assessment and Environmental Health Indicators, German Environment Agency, Corrensplatz 1, Berlin 14195, Germany. dietrich.plass@uba.de.
Stephan Bose-O'ReillyUnit Paediatric Environmental Epidemiology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Occupational Health, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich 80336, Germany. stephan.boeseoreilly@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In artisanal small-scale gold mining, mercury is used for gold-extraction, putting miners and nearby residents at risk of chronic metallic mercury vapor intoxication (CMMVI). Burden of disease (BoD) analyses allow the estimation of the public health relevance of CMMVI, but until now there have been no specific CMMVI disability weights (DWs). The objective is to derive DWs for moderate and severe CMMVI. Disease-specific and generic health state descriptions of 18 diseases were used in a pairwise comparison survey. Mercury and BoD experts were invited to participate in an online survey. Data were analyzed using probit regression. Local regression was used to make the DWs comparable to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. Alternative survey (visual analogue scale) and data analyses approaches (linear interpolation) were evaluated in scenario analyses. A total of 105 participants completed the questionnaire. DWs for moderate and severe CMMVI were 0.368 (0.261-0.484) and 0.588 (0.193-0.907), respectively. Scenario analyses resulted in higher mean values. The results are limited by the sample size, group of interviewees, questionnaire extent, and lack of generally accepted health state descriptions. DWs were derived to improve the data basis of mercury-related BoD estimates, providing useful information for policy-making. Integration of the results into the GBD DWs enhances comparability.

Indexed as

GoldHeavy Metal PoisoningMiningPersons with DisabilitiesPoisoningAdultAgedAir PollutantsChronic DiseaseCost of IllnessEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansMaleMercuryMiddle AgedAir PollutantsGoldMercuryartisanal small-scale gold miningburden of diseasechronic metallic mercury vapor intoxicationdisability weightsmercurypairwise comparisonvisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID28075395
PMCPMC5295308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.