Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28075375›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017

An Approach to Biometric Verification Based on Human Body Communication in Wearable Devices.

Jingzhen Li, Yuhang Liu, Zedong Nie, Wenjian Qin, Zengyao Pang, Lei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingzhen LiShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenzhen 518055, China. lijz@siat.ac.cn.
Yuhang LiuShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenzhen 518055, China. yh.liu2@siat.ac.cn.
Zedong NieShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenzhen 518055, China. zd.nie@siat.ac.cn.
Wenjian QinShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenzhen 518055, China. wj.qin@siat.ac.cn.
Zengyao PangShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenzhen 518055, China. dl.yang@siat.ac.cn.
Lei WangShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenzhen 518055, China. wang.lei@siat.ac.cn.
Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, an approach to biometric verification based on human body communication (HBC) is presented for wearable devices. For this purpose, the transmission gain S21 of volunteer's forearm is measured by vector network analyzer (VNA). Specifically, in order to determine the chosen frequency for biometric verification, 1800 groups of data are acquired from 10 volunteers in the frequency range 0.3 MHz to 1500 MHz, and each group includes 1601 sample data. In addition, to achieve the rapid verification, 30 groups of data for each volunteer are acquired at the chosen frequency, and each group contains only 21 sample data. Furthermore, a threshold-adaptive template matching (TATM) algorithm based on weighted Euclidean distance is proposed for rapid verification in this work. The results indicate that the chosen frequency for biometric verification is from 650 MHz to 750 MHz. The false acceptance rate (FAR) and false rejection rate (FRR) based on TATM are approximately 5.79% and 6.74%, respectively. In contrast, the FAR and FRR were 4.17% and 37.5%, 3.37% and 33.33%, and 3.80% and 34.17% using K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classification, support vector machines (SVM), and naive Bayesian method (NBM) classification, respectively. In addition, the running time of TATM is 0.019 s, whereas the running times of KNN, SVM and NBM are 0.310 s, 0.0385 s, and 0.168 s, respectively. Therefore, TATM is suggested to be appropriate for rapid verification use in wearable devices.

Indexed as

biometric verificationhuman body communicationthreshold-adaptive template matchingtransmission gain S21wearable deviceweighted Euclidean distance

Identifiers

PMID28075375
PMCPMC5298698
OpenAlexW2571193586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.