Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28074896›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Enhances Information Sharing and Group Decision Making Quality.

Tim R W De Wilde, Femke S Ten Velden, Carsten K W De Dreu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Interpersonal heart rate synchrony predicts effective information processing in a naturalistic group decision-making task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Infection threat shapes our social instincts.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The role of social cognition in parasite and pathogen avoidance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tim R W De WildeDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15919, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Femke S Ten VeldenDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15919, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carsten K W De DreuInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groups can make better decisions than individuals when members cooperatively exchange and integrate their uniquely held information and insights. However, under conformity pressures group members are biased towards exchanging commonly known information, and away from exchanging unique information, thus undermining group decision-making quality. At the neurobiological level, conformity associates with the neuropeptide oxytocin. A double-blind placebo controlled study found no evidence for oxytocin induced conformity. Compared to placebo groups, three-person groups whose members received intranasal oxytocin, focused more on unique information (i) and repeated this information more often (ii). These findings reveal oxytocin as a neurobiological driver of group decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalNegotiatingNeuropeptidesOxytocinYoung AdultNeuropeptidesOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID28074896
PMCPMC5225413
OpenAlexW2572096807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.