Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28074887›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2017

Association analysis of dyslexia candidate genes in a Dutch longitudinal sample.

Amaia Carrion-Castillo, Ben Maassen, Barbara Franke, Angelien Heister, Marlies Naber, Aryan van der Leij, Clyde Francks, Simon E Fisher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Examining the Etiology of Reading Disability as Conceptualized by the Hybrid Model.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amaia Carrion-CastilloLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0226-0642
Ben MaassenCentre for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Barbara FrankeDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4375-6572
Angelien HeisterDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marlies NaberDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Aryan van der LeijResearch Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clyde FrancksLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Simon E FisherLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dyslexia is a common specific learning disability with a substantive genetic component. Several candidate genes have been proposed to be implicated in dyslexia susceptibility, such as DYX1C1, ROBO1, KIAA0319, and DCDC2. Associations with variants in these genes have also been reported with a variety of psychometric measures tapping into the underlying processes that might be impaired in dyslexic people. In this study, we first conducted a literature review to select single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in dyslexia candidate genes that had been repeatedly implicated across studies. We then assessed the SNPs for association in the richly phenotyped longitudinal data set from the Dutch Dyslexia Program. We tested for association with several quantitative traits, including word and nonword reading fluency, rapid naming, phoneme deletion, and nonword repetition. In this, we took advantage of the longitudinal nature of the sample to examine if associations were stable across four educational time-points (from 7 to 12 years). Two SNPs in the KIAA0319 gene were nominally associated with rapid naming, and these associations were stable across different ages. Genetic association analysis with complex cognitive traits can be enriched through the use of longitudinal information on trait development.

Indexed as

ChildChild DevelopmentCytoskeletal ProteinsDyslexiaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNetherlandsNuclear ProteinsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, ImmunologicRoundabout ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsDCDC2 protein, humanDNAAF4 protein, humanKIAA0319 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsReceptors, ImmunologicRoundabout Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28074887
PMCPMC5386414
OpenAlexW2577978787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.