Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28074412›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2017

A Scientific Rationale to Improve Resistance Training Prescription in Exercise Oncology.

Ciaran M Fairman, Michael C Zourdos, Eric R Helms, Brian C Focht

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06134297 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Adherence, Feasibility, Clinical Evolution Therapeutic Efficacy of Three Different Muscle Overload Models Used for Physical Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow Transplantation: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreRan2022 to 2024Enrolled93ConditionsStem Cell TransplantationArmsCycle ergometer, Strength Training - elastic band and shin guards, Cycle ergometer, elastic band and shin guards
NCT07253103 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

"Effects of a Resistance Physical Exercise Program in Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol".

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SalamancaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsMultiple Myeloma (MM), Exercise, CancerArmsSupervised physical exercise, Home-based physical exercise program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Exercise prescription for symptoms and quality of life improvements in lung cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ciaran M FairmanKinesiology, Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, 305 W Anne and John Glenn Ave, Columbus, OH, 43201, USA. Fairman.13@osu.edu.
Michael C ZourdosDepartment of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Muscle Physiology Laboratory, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Eric R HelmsSport Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Brian C FochtKinesiology, Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, 305 W Anne and John Glenn Ave, Columbus, OH, 43201, USA.
The Ohio State University · USAuckland University of Technology · NZFlorida Atlantic University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, the prevailing evidence in the field of exercise oncology supports the safety and efficacy of resistance training to attenuate many oncology treatment-related adverse effects, such as risk for cardiovascular disease, increased fatigue, and diminished physical functioning and quality of life. Moreover, findings in the extant literature supporting the benefits of exercise for survivors of and patients with cancer have resulted in the release of exercise guidelines from several international agencies. However, despite research progression and international recognition, current exercise oncology-based exercise prescriptions remain relatively basic and underdeveloped, particularly in regards to resistance training. Recent publications have called for a more precise manipulation of training variables such as volume, intensity, and frequency (i.e., periodization), given the large heterogeneity of a cancer population, to truly optimize clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. Indeed, increased attention to integrating fundamental principles of exercise physiology into the exercise prescription process could optimize the safety and efficacy of resistance training during cancer care. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the current state of resistance training prescription and discuss novel methods that can contribute to improving approaches to exercise prescription. We hope this article may facilitate further evaluation of best practice regarding resistance training prescription, monitoring, and modification to ultimately optimize the efficacy of integrating resistance training as a supportive care intervention for survivors or and patients with cancer.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyHumansNeoplasmsQuality of LifeResistance TrainingSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID28074412
OpenAlexW2569142725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.