Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28074382›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2017

Engaging Hmong adults in genomic and pharmacogenomic research: Toward reducing health disparities in genomic knowledge using a community-based participatory research approach.

Kathleen A Culhane-Pera, Robert J Straka, MaiKia Moua, Youssef Roman, Pachia Vue, Kang Xiaaj, May Xia Lo, Mai Lor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Optimizing G6PD testing forWellcome open research · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen A Culhane-PeraWest Side Community Health Services, 153 Cesar Chavez St, Saint Paul, MN, 55107, USA. kathiecp@yahoo.com.
Robert J StrakaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy University of Minnesota, 7-115 Weaver-Densford Hall, 308 Harvard St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
MaiKia MouaBenton County Health Services, 530 NW 27th St, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA.
Youssef RomanDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy University of Minnesota, 7-115 Weaver-Densford Hall, 308 Harvard St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Pachia VueUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview Campus, 2450 Riverside Ave, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Kang XiaajWest Side Community Health Services, 153 Cesar Chavez St, Saint Paul, MN, 55107, USA.
May Xia LoPhalen Family Pharmacy, 1001 Johnson Parkway, St Paul, MN, 55106, USA.
Mai LorDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy University of Minnesota, 7-115 Weaver-Densford Hall, 308 Harvard St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
University of Minnesota · USCommunity Health and Emergency Services · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancing precision medicine relies in part on examining populations that may exhibit unique genetic variants that impact clinical outcomes. Failure to include diverse populations in genomic-based research represents a health disparity. We implemented a community-based participatory research (CBPR) process with the Hmong community in Minnesota, who were refugees from Laos, in order to assess the feasibility of conducting genomic and pharmacogenomic-based research for genetic variants that are relevant to the Hmong community. Our Hmong Genomics Board, consisting of Hmong and non-Hmong professionals, used CBPR principles and built on previous formative research to create and implement culturally and linguistically appropriate informed consent processes for Hmong people at six community venues. The Board chose genetic variants for diabetes risk and warfarin response as relevant to the community. The Institutional Review Board approved aggregate but not individual return of results. Two hundred thirty-seven Hmong participants with mean (range) age of 30.2 (18-81) years and diverse levels of education (22% without and 75% with high-school education) provided saliva for genetic (DNA) analyses. Eighty-five percent of participants agreed to store DNA for future analyses, 82% agreed to share DNA with other researchers, and 78% agreed to be contacted for future studies. Twenty-five elders refused to participate because they wanted individual results. Aggregate results were shared with all participants. This CBPR approach proved highly successful to obtain informed consent and recruit a sample from the Hmong community for a genomic and pharmacogenomic study. Investment in the CBPR process may prove successful to address the gap of genomic information in under-represented communities.

Indexed as

Community-based participatory researchGenomicsHmongPharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID28074382
PMCPMC5386914
OpenAlexW2570179609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.