Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28074324›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

How to deal with giant pituitary adenomas: transsphenoidal or transcranial, simultaneous or two-staged?

Sheng Han, Wei Gao, Zhitao Jing, Yunjie Wang, Anhua Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Estimating Risk of Pituitary Apoplexy after Resection of Giant Pituitary Adenomas.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheng HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Nanjing Street 155, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Wei GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Nanjing Street 155, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Zhitao JingDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Nanjing Street 155, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Yunjie WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Nanjing Street 155, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Anhua WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Nanjing Street 155, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China. cmuwuanhua@aliyun.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant pituitary adenomas (diameter >4 cm) are a challenge to treat, and there is no consensus on the optimal surgical strategy. We report here our experience in surgical management of these lesions. Adult patients with giant pituitary adenomas (n = 62; 54 non-functioning and eight hormone-secreting adenomas) who underwent surgical resection at our hospital from 2009 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Single transsphenoidal and transcranial approaches were used in 43 (69.4%) and four (6.5%) patients, respectively. A combined transsphenoidal and transcranial approach was used in 13 patients (20.9%) and in two patients (3.2%), a transcranial procedure was followed 3 months later by a transsphenoidal approach. Greater than 90% resection was achieved in 47 cases (75.8%). During a mean follow-up period of 46.9 months, 49 patients (79%) showed improved visual impairment scores, while none experienced visual deterioration. There was no post-operative hemorrhage or mortality. A total of 27 patients (43.5%) received adjuvant medical and/or radiation therapy. At last follow-up, eight patients (12.9%) had recurrence. For giant pituitary adenoma, the transsphenoidal and transcranial approaches should be combined flexibly based on the characteristics of the tumor. In certain cases, a simultaneous combined approach can maximize tumor extirpation and lower the risk of swelling and bleeding of the residual tumor.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAdenomaAdultAgedDwarfism, PituitaryFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresNoseRetrospective StudiesSkullEndoscopePituitary adenomaTranscranialTranssphenoidal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.