Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28074175›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of genomics2016

Gene Expression Analysis of Alfalfa Seedlings Response to Acid-Aluminum.

Peng Zhou, Liantai Su, Aimin Lv, Shengyin Wang, Bingru Huang, Yuan An

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Differential gene expression in leaves and roots ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. MsDjB4, a HSP40 Chaperone in Alfalfa (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Chinese herbal medicines · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of alumina (Al3 Biotech · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peng ZhouSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6639-5496
Liantai SuSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7314-262X
Aimin LvSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Shengyin WangSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Bingru HuangDepartment of Plant Biology and Pathology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Yuan AnSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South), Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 201101, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8686-2140
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acid-Aluminum (Al) is toxic to plants and greatly affects crop production worldwide. To understand the responses of plants to acid soils and Aluminum toxicity, we examined global gene expression using microarray data in alfalfa seedlings with the treatment of acid-Aluminum. 3,926 genes that were identified significantly up- or downregulated in response to Al

Identifiers

PMID28074175
PMCPMC5198156
OpenAlexW2565097473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.