Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28074134›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2016

Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service.

K Gillett, K Lippiett, C Astles, J Longstaff, R Orlando, S X Lin, A Powell, C Roberts, A J Chauhan, M Thomas and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

K GillettNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Respiratory Theme , Southampton , UK.
K LippiettNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Respiratory Theme , Southampton , UK.
C AstlesNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Respiratory Theme , Southampton , UK.
J LongstaffWessex Academic Health Sciences Network (AHSN) , Portsmouth , UK.
R OrlandoNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Methodological Hub , Southampton , UK.
S X LinNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Methodological Hub , Southampton , UK.
A PowellWest Hampshire Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) , Eastleigh , UK.
C RobertsWessex Academic Health Sciences Network (AHSN) , Portsmouth , UK.
A J ChauhanWessex Academic Health Sciences Network (AHSN) , Portsmouth , UK.
M ThomasNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Respiratory Theme, Southampton, UK; Department of Primary Care and Populations Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
T M WilkinsonNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Respiratory Theme, Southampton, UK; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
National Institute for Health Research · GBWessex Academic Health Science Network (United Kingdom) · GBNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater ManchesterBristol Clinical Commissioning Group · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the UK, there is significant variation in respiratory care and outcomes. An integrated approach to the management of high-risk respiratory patients, incorporating specialist and primary care teams' expertise, is the basis for new integrated respiratory services designed to reduce this variation; however, this model needs evaluating.

methodsTo evaluate an integrated service managing high-risk respiratory patients, electronic searches for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at risk of poor outcomes were performed in two general practitioner (GP) practices in a local service-development initiative. Patients were reviewed at joint clinics by primary and secondary care professionals. GPs also nominated patients for inclusion. Reviews were delivered to best standards of care including assessments of diagnosis, control, spirometry, self-management, education, medication, inhaler technique and smoking cessation support. Follow-up of routine clinical data collected at 9-months postclinic were compared with seasonally matched 9-months prior to integrated review.

results82 patients were identified, 55 attended. 13 (23.6%) had their primary diagnosis changed. In comparison with the seasonally adjusted baseline period, in the 9-month follow-up there was an increase in inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions of 23.3%, a reduction in short-acting β

conclusionsPatients with respiratory disease in this region at risk of suboptimal outcomes identified proactively and managed by an integrated team improved outcomes without the need for hospital referral.

Indexed as

Asthma GuidelinesCOPD ExacerbationsHealth Economist

Identifiers

PMID28074134
PMCPMC5174798
OpenAlexW2559891028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.