Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28074107›Full record

ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2017

Frequency of

R Robial, A Longatto-Filho, C M Roteli-Martins, M F Silveira, D Stauffert, G G Ribeiro, I M Linhares, M Tacla, M A Zonta, E C Baracat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacterial-Mediated Tumor Therapy: Old Treatment in a New Context.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Distribution ofFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

R RobialDivision of Gynecologic Clinic, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5108-924X
A Longatto-FilhoLaboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM) 14, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil ; Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil ; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal ; ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.
C M Roteli-MartinsLeonor M De Barros Hospital - Secretaria de Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
M F SilveiraFederal University of Pelotas - Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
D StauffertFederal University of Pelotas - Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
G G RibeiroSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
I M LinharesDivision of Gynecologic Clinic, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
M TaclaDivision of Gynecologic Clinic, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
M A ZontaDiscipline of Infectology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
E C BaracatDivision of Gynecologic Clinic, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BRSecretaria da Saúde · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 1481 cervical samples from asymptomatic women aged 18 to 64. Samples were collected for liquid-based cytology and Ct detection by polymerase chain reaction. p16/Ki-67 double staining was performed on samples with abnormal cytology. Statistical analysis was by chi-square and likelihood-ratio tests. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined.

resultsThe frequency of Ct was 15.6% and its presence was not associated with detection of p16/Ki-67 [OR = 1.35 (0.5-3.4)]. There was also no association between abnormal cervical cytology and

conclusionsThe asymptomatic women in our study had a high frequency of Ct infection but this was not associated with p16/Ki-67 detection in samples with abnormal cytology. The expression of p16/Ki-67 was highest in women with high-grade CIN (

Indexed as

Cervical cancerChlamydiaImmunocytochemistryki 67

Identifiers

PMID28074107
PMCPMC5219725
OpenAlexW2569089745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.