Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28073890›Full record

ArticleGut2018

Pancreatic cancer cell lines as patient-derived avatars: genetic characterisation and functional utility.

Erik S Knudsen, Uthra Balaji, Brian Mannakee, Paris Vail, Cody Eslinger, Christopher Moxom, John Mansour, Agnieszka K Witkiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How can we establish animal models of HIV-associated lymphoma?Animal models and experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erik S KnudsenUniversity of Arizona Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Uthra BalajiMcDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Brian MannakeeUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Paris VailUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Cody EslingerMcDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Christopher MoxomMcDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
John MansourDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Agnieszka K WitkiewiczUniversity of Arizona Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Dan Theodorescu · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
Common Genetically Altered Pathways as Targets for Therapy in Pancreatic CancerR01CA211878 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI KNUDSEN, ERIK, WITKIEWICZ, AGNIESZKA · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Development of New Cancer Treatments and InvestigatorsK24CA201543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GERBER, DAVID ERIC · 2016 to 2020
$737k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA201543NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a therapy recalcitrant disease with the worst survival rate of common solid tumours. Preclinical models that accurately reflect the genetic and biological diversity of PDAC will be important for delineating features of tumour biology and therapeutic vulnerabilities.

design27 primary PDAC tumours were employed for genetic analysis and development of tumour models. Tumour tissue was used for derivation of xenografts and cell lines. Exome sequencing was performed on the originating tumour and developed models. RNA sequencing, histological and functional analyses were employed to determine the relationship of the patient-derived models to clinical presentation of PDAC.

resultsThe cohort employed captured the genetic diversity of PDAC. From most cases, both cell lines and xenograft models were developed. Exome sequencing confirmed preservation of the primary tumour mutations in developed cell lines, which remained stable with extended passaging. The level of genetic conservation in the cell lines was comparable to that observed with patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Unlike historically established PDAC cancer cell lines, patient-derived models recapitulated the histological architecture of the primary tumour and exhibited metastatic spread similar to that observed clinically. Detailed genetic analyses of tumours and derived models revealed features of ex vivo evolution and the clonal architecture of PDAC. Functional analysis was used to elucidate therapeutic vulnerabilities of relevance to treatment of PDAC.

conclusionsThese data illustrate that with the appropriate methods it is possible to develop cell lines that maintain genetic features of PDAC. Such models serve as important substrates for analysing the significance of genetic variants and create a unique biorepository of annotated cell lines and xenografts that were established simultaneously from same primary tumour. These models can be used to infer genetic and empirically determined therapeutic sensitivities that would be germane to the patient.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmExome SequencingFemaleGene ExpressionHeterograftsHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedDNA, NeoplasmKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)RNA, NeoplasmSmad4 ProteinSMAD4 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53CANCER GENETICSONCOGENESPANCREATIC CANCER

Identifiers

PMID28073890
PMCPMC5868284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.