ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017
Phase 1 study of twice weekly pulse dose and daily low-dose erlotinib as initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers.
Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of optimal dosing schedules of dacomitinib and osimertinib for a phase I/II trial in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.Nature communications · 2021Trial
- Phase 2 study of intermittent pulse dacomitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017Trial
- Can evolutionary therapy be applied in non-small cell lung cancer?Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Understanding patient-derived tumor organoid growth through an integrated imaging and mathematical modeling framework.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria for brain metastases in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated-mutated and ALK-fusion non-small cell lung cancer.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Emerging therapeutics and evolving assessment criteria for intracranial metastases in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023Review
- The role of targeted therapy and immune therapy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Effect of EGFR-TKIs combined with craniocerebral radiotherapy on the prognosis ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Cross-Resistance Among Sequential Cancer Therapeutics: An Emerging Issue.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Modeling Resistance and Recurrence Patterns of Combined Targeted-Chemoradiotherapy Predicts Benefit of Shorter Induction Period.Cancer research · 2020Article
- Management of brain metastases according to molecular subtypes.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2020Review
- Pharmacokinetic Profiles Determine Optimal Combination Treatment Schedules in Computational Models of Drug Resistance.Cancer research · 2020Article
- Nuances to precision dosing strategies of targeted cancer medicines.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Review
- Towards Multidrug Adaptive Therapy.Cancer research · 2020Article
- Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2019Review
- Optimization of Cancer Treatment in the Frequency Domain.The AAPS journal · 2019Article
- EGFR first- and second-generation TKIs-there is still place for them inTranslational cancer research · 2019Review
- Targeting Molecular Pathways in Intracranial Metastatic Disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Medical Treatment Options for Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Suffering from Brain Metastases and/or Leptomeningeal Disease.Targeted oncology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) develop clinical resistance, most commonly with acquisition of EGFR T790M. Evolutionary modeling suggests that a schedule of twice weekly pulse and daily low-dose erlotinib may delay emergence of EGFR T790M. Pulse dose erlotinib has superior central nervous system (CNS) penetration and may result in superior CNS disease control. Methods: We evaluated toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of twice weekly pulse and daily low-dose erlotinib. We assessed six escalating pulse doses of erlotinib. Results: We enrolled 34 patients; 11 patients (32%) had brain metastases at study entry. We observed 3 dose-limiting toxicities in dose escalation: transaminitis, mucositis, and rash. The MTD was erlotinib 1200 mg days 1-2 and 50 mg days 3-7 weekly. The most frequent toxicities (any grade) were rash, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and mucositis. 1 complete and 24 partial responses were observed (74%, 95% CI 60-84%). Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI 5.8-15.4 months). No patient had progression of an untreated CNS metastasis or developed a new CNS lesion while on study (0%, 95% CI 0-13%). Of the 18 patients with biopsies at progression, EGFR T790M was identified in 78% (95% CI 54-91%). Conclusion: This is the first clinical implementation of an anti-cancer TKI regimen combining pulse and daily low-dose administration. This evolutionary modeling-based dosing schedule was well-tolerated but did not improve progression-free survival or prevent emergence of EGFR T790M, likely due to insufficient peak serum concentrations of erlotinib. This dosing schedule prevented progression of untreated or any new central nervous system metastases in all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.