Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28073361›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa.

Corrina Moucheraud, Amee Schwitters, Chantelle Boudreaux, Denise Giles, Peter H Kilmarx, Ntolo Ntolo, Zwashe Bangani, Michael E St Louis, Thomas J Bossert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Corrina MoucheraudDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of California Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. cmoucheraud@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7862-7928
Amee SchwittersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Maseru, Lesotho.
Chantelle BoudreauxDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Denise GilesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Maputo, Mozambique.
Peter H KilmarxCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Ntolo NtoloJSI Research and Training Institute, Inc, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Zwashe BanganiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Michael E St LouisDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Thomas J BossertDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the introduction of electronic health information systems (EHIS), which are considered more responsive and more efficient than older, paper-based systems. As many donor-driven programs are increasing their focus on country ownership, sustainability of these investments is a key concern. This analysis explores the potential sustainability of EHIS investments in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, originally supported by the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).

methodsUsing a framework based on sustainability theories from the health systems literature, this analysis employs a qualitative case study methodology to highlight factors that may increase the likelihood that donor-supported initiatives will continue after the original support is modified or ends.

resultsFindings highlight commonalities around possible determinants of sustainability. The study found that there is great optimism about the potential for EHIS, but the perceived risks may result in hesitancy to transition completely and parallel use of paper-based systems. Full stakeholder engagement is likely to be crucial for sustainability, as well as integration with other activities within the health system and those funded by development partners. The literature suggests that a sustainable system has clearly-defined goals around which stakeholders can rally, but this has not been achieved in the systems studied. The study also found that technical resource constraints - affecting system usage, maintenance, upgrades and repairs - may limit EHIS sustainability even if these other pillars were addressed.

conclusionsThe sustainability of EHIS faces many challenges, which could be addressed through systems' technical design, stakeholder coordination, and the building of organizational capacity to maintain and enhance such systems. All of this requires time and attention, but is likely to enhance long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

International CooperationHealth Information SystemsHealth ResourcesHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMalawiQualitative ResearchUnited StatesZambiaZimbabweDevelopment assistanceElectronic medical record systemHealth information systemsPEPFARSustainability

Identifiers

PMID28073361
PMCPMC5223327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.