Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28072880›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Characterisation of Early-Life Fecal Microbiota in Susceptible and Healthy Pigs to Post-Weaning Diarrhoea.

Samir Dou, Pascale Gadonna-Widehem, Véronique Rome, Dounia Hamoudi, Larbi Rhazi, Lyes Lakhal, Thibaut Larcher, Narges Bahi-Jaber, Arturo Pinon-Quintana, Alain Guyonvarch and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Early-life intervention withFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Samir DouUP 2012.10.101.EGEAL, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, rue Pierre Waguet Beauvais, France.
Pascale Gadonna-WidehemUP 2012.10.101.EGEAL, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, rue Pierre Waguet Beauvais, France.
Véronique RomeINRA, UR1341 ADNC, Domaine de la Prise, Saint-Gilles, France.
Dounia HamoudiUP 2012.10.101.EGEAL, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, rue Pierre Waguet Beauvais, France.
Larbi RhaziUP 2012.10.101.EGEAL, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, rue Pierre Waguet Beauvais, France.
Lyes LakhalInstitut polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, Direction de la recherche, rue Pierre Waguet Beauvais, France.
Thibaut LarcherINRA, UMR 703 APEX, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire Agroalimentaire et de l'Alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (Oniris), Nantes, France.
Narges Bahi-JaberUP 2012.10.101.EGEAL, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, rue Pierre Waguet Beauvais, France.
Arturo Pinon-QuintanaINVIVO-NSA, Direction Scientifique Technique et Innovation, Département Innovation et Prospectives, Talhouët Saint Nolff, France.
Alain GuyonvarchINVIVO-NSA, Direction Scientifique Technique et Innovation, Département Innovation et Prospectives, Talhouët Saint Nolff, France.
Isabelle L E Huërou-LuronINRA, UR1341 ADNC, Domaine de la Prise, Saint-Gilles, France.
Latifa Abdennebi-NajarUP 2012.10.101.EGEAL, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, rue Pierre Waguet Beauvais, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-life microbial exposure is of particular importance to growth, immune system development and long-lasting health. Hence, early microbiota composition is a promising predictive biomarker for health and disease but still remains poorly characterized in regards to susceptibility to diarrhoea. In the present study, we aimed to assess if gut bacterial community diversity and composition during the suckling period were associated with differences in susceptibility of pigs to post-weaning diarrhoea. Twenty piglets from 5 sows (4 piglets / litter) were weaned in poor housing conditions to challenge their susceptibility to post-weaning diarrhoea. Two weeks after weaning, 13 pigs exhibited liquid faeces during 2 or 3 days and were defined as diarrhoeic (D) pigs. The other 7 pigs did not have diarrhea during the whole post-weaning experimental periodand were defined as healthy (H) pigs. Using a molecular characterisation of fecal microbiota with CE-SSCP fingerprint, Next Generation Sequencing and qPCR, we show that D and H pigs were mainly discriminated as early as postnatal day (PND) 7, i.e. 4 weeks before post-weaning diarrhoea occurence. At PND 7 H pigs displayed a lower evenness and a higher abundance of Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminocacaceae and Lactobacillaceae compared to D pigs. The sPLS regression method indicates that these bacterial families were strongly correlated to a higher Bacteroidetes abundance observed in PND 30 H pigs one week before diarrhoea. These results emphasize the potential of early microbiota diversity and composition as being an indicator of susceptibility to post-weaning diarrhoea. Furthermore, they support the health promoting strategies of pig herds through gut microbiota engineering.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCase-Control StudiesDiarrheaLactobacillaceaePrevotellaRuminococcusSwineSwine DiseasesWeaning

Identifiers

PMID28072880
PMCPMC5225014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.