Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28072875›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Characterization of the Activity Spectrum of MON 88702 and the Plant-Incorporated Protectant Cry51Aa2.834_16.

Pamela M Bachman, Aqeel Ahmad, Jeffrey E Ahrens, Waseem Akbar, James A Baum, Scott Brown, Thomas L Clark, Jennifer M Fridley, Anilkumar Gowda, John T Greenplate and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Plant-AssociatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Sublethal Endpoints in Non-target Organism Testing for Insect-Active GE Crops.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pamela M BachmanMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-0479
Aqeel AhmadMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Jeffrey E AhrensMonsanto Company, Chesterfield, Missouri, United States of America.
Waseem AkbarMonsanto Company, Chesterfield, Missouri, United States of America.
James A BaumMonsanto Company, Chesterfield, Missouri, United States of America.
Scott BrownMonsanto Company, Chesterfield, Missouri, United States of America.
Thomas L ClarkMonsanto Company, Chesterfield, Missouri, United States of America.
Jennifer M FridleyMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Anilkumar GowdaMonsanto Company, Chesterfield, Missouri, United States of America.
John T GreenplateMonsanto Company, Chesterfield, Missouri, United States of America.
Peter D JensenMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Geoffrey M MuellerMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Matthew L OdegaardMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Jianguo TanMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Joshua P UffmanMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Steven L LevineMonsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Monsanto (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spectrum of insecticidal activity of Cry51Aa2.834_16 protein targeting hemipteran and thysanopteran insect pests in cotton was characterized by selecting and screening multiple pest and non-pest species, based on representation of ecological functional groups, taxonomic relatedness (e.g. relationship to species where activity was observed), and availability for effective testing. Seven invertebrate orders, comprising 12 families and 17 representative species were screened for susceptibility to Cry51Aa2.834_16 protein and/or the ability of the protein to protect against feeding damage in laboratory, controlled environments (e.g. greenhouse/growth chamber), and/or field studies when present in cotton plants. The screening results presented for Cry51Aa2.834_16 demonstrate selective and limited activity within three insect orders. Other than Orius insidiosus, no activity was observed for Cry51Aa2.834_16 against several groups of arthropods that perform key ecological roles in some agricultural ecosystems (e.g. pollinators, decomposers, and natural enemies).

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsArthropodsDisease ResistanceFemaleGossypiumInsecticidesMalePest Control, BiologicalPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedProtective AgentsInsecticidesPlant ProteinsProtective Agents

Identifiers

PMID28072875
PMCPMC5224830
OpenAlexW2570661193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.