Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28072845›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Tuberculosis Detection in Paratuberculosis Vaccinated Calves: New Alternatives against Interference.

Miriam Serrano, Natalia Elguezabal, Iker A Sevilla, María V Geijo, Elena Molina, Rakel Arrazuria, Alfonso Urkitza, Gareth J Jones, Martin Vordermeier, Joseba M Garrido and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Comparative Study ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  4. Probiotic bacteria can modulate immune responses to paratuberculosis vaccination.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Effects of SilirumAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Paratuberculosis: The Hidden Killer of Small Ruminants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Interferon-γ Response ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. ESX Secretion-Associated Protein C FromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam SerranoNEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Animal Health Department, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Natalia ElguezabalNEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Animal Health Department, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Iker A SevillaNEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Animal Health Department, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
María V GeijoNEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Animal Health Department, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Elena MolinaNEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Animal Health Department, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Rakel ArrazuriaNEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Animal Health Department, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Alfonso UrkitzaBovine Practitioner, Gernika, Bizkaia, Spain.
Gareth J JonesTB Immunology and Vaccinology, Department of Bacteriology, APHA, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Martin VordermeierTB Immunology and Vaccinology, Department of Bacteriology, APHA, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Joseba M GarridoNEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Animal Health Department, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Ramón A JusteNEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Animal Health Department, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Tecnalia · ESAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBNEIKER, the Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development · ESEuskadiko Parke Teknologikoa · ESServicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paratuberculosis vaccination in cattle has been restricted due to its possible interference with the official diagnostic methods used in tuberculosis eradication programs. To overcome this drawback, new possibilities to detect Mycobacterium bovis infected cattle in paratuberculosis vaccinated animals were studied under experimental conditions. Three groups of 5 calves each were included in the experiment: one paratuberculosis vaccinated group, one paratuberculosis vaccinated and M. bovis infected group and one M. bovis infected group. The performance of the IFN-gamma release assay (IGRA) and the skin test using conventional avian and bovine tuberculins (A- and B-PPD) but also other more specific antigens (ESAT-6/CFP10 and Rv3615c) was studied under official and new diagnostic criteria. Regarding the IGRA of vaccinated groups, when A- and B-PPD were used the sensitivity reached 100% at the first post-challenge sampling, dropping down to 40-80% in subsequent samplings. The sensitivity for the specific antigens was 80-100% and the specificity was also improved. After adapting the diagnostic criteria for the conventional antigens in the skin test, the ability to differentiate between M. bovis infected and non-infected animals included in paratuberculosis vaccinated groups was enhanced. Taking for positive a relative skin thickness increase of at least 100%, the single intradermal test specificity and sensitivity yielded 100%. The comparative intradermal test was equally accurate considering a B-PPD relative skin increase of at least 100% and greater than or equal to that produced by A-PPD. Using the specific antigens as a proteic cocktail, the specificity and sensitivity reached 100% considering the new relative and absolute cut-offs in all experimental groups (Δ≥30% and Δmm ≥ 2, respectively). Results suggest that the interference caused by paratuberculosis vaccination in cattle could be completely overcome by applying new approaches to the official tuberculosis diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleInterferon-gamma Release TestsParatuberculosisSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculin TestTuberculosis, BovineTuberculosis VaccinesVaccinationTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID28072845
PMCPMC5224860
OpenAlexW2567785015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.