ArticlePloS one2017
Testing the Efficacy of DNA Barcodes for Identifying the Vascular Plants of Canada.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variation in microbial and plant associations across wild bee families, functional groups, and urban environments.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Pollen Foraging by Bumble Bee Queens During a Critical Nesting Period Revealed by DNA Metabarcoding.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Mock Plant Communities and a Large Mammal Case Study Reveal ITS2 Primer Bias Against Graminoids.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Pasture Composition: DNA Metabarcoding Versus Quadrat-Based Botanical Surveys in Experimental Grassland Plots.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Seed protein biotyping in Amaranthus species: a tool for rapid identification of weedy amaranths of concern.Plant methods · 2023Article
- The structure of tropical bat-plant interaction networks during an extreme El Niño-Southern Oscillation event.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- Life barcoded by DNA barcodes.Conservation genetics resources · 2022Review
- Testing the effectiveness ofPeerJ · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Arabian Vascular Plant Barcodes (rbcL and matK): Precision of Unsupervised and Supervised Learning Methods towards Accurate Identification.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- DNA barcoding ferns in an unexplored tropical montane cloud forest area of southeast Oaxaca, Mexico.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the trnK-matK-trnK, ycf3, and accD-psal chloroplast regions to differentiate crop type and biogeographical origin of Cannabis sativa.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Examining the utility of DNA barcodes for the identification of tallgrass prairie flora.Applications in plant sciences · 2021Article
- Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Microfluidic Enrichment Barcoding (MEBarcoding): a new method for high throughput plant DNA barcoding.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Treasure Vault Can be Opened: Large-Scale Genome Skimming Works Well Using Herbarium and Silica Gel Dried Material.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The utility of DNA barcodes to confirm the identification of palm collections in botanical gardens.PloS one · 2020Article
- High-resolution melting of multiple barcode amplicons for plant species authentication.Food control · 2019Article
- Metabarcoding a diverse arthropod mock community.Molecular ecology resources · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Their relatively slow rates of molecular evolution, as well as frequent exposure to hybridization and introgression, often make it difficult to discriminate species of vascular plants with the standard barcode markers (rbcL, matK, ITS2). Previous studies have examined these constraints in narrow geographic or taxonomic contexts, but the present investigation expands analysis to consider the performance of these gene regions in discriminating the species in local floras at sites across Canada. To test identification success, we employed a DNA barcode reference library with sequence records for 96% of the 5108 vascular plant species known from Canada, but coverage varied from 94% for rbcL to 60% for ITS2 and 39% for matK. Using plant lists from 27 national parks and one scientific reserve, we tested the efficacy of DNA barcodes in identifying the plants in simulated species assemblages from six biogeographic regions of Canada using BLAST and mothur. Mean pairwise distance (MPD) and mean nearest taxon distance (MNTD) were strong predictors of barcode performance for different plant families and genera, and both metrics supported ITS2 as possessing the highest genetic diversity. All three genes performed strongly in assigning the taxa present in local floras to the correct genus with values ranging from 91% for rbcL to 97% for ITS2 and 98% for matK. However, matK delivered the highest species discrimination (~81%) followed by ITS2 (~72%) and rbcL (~44%). Despite the low number of plant taxa in the Canadian Arctic, DNA barcodes had the least success in discriminating species from this biogeographic region with resolution ranging from 36% with rbcL to 69% with matK. Species resolution was higher in the other settings, peaking in the Woodland region at 52% for rbcL and 87% for matK. Our results indicate that DNA barcoding is very effective in identifying Canadian plants to a genus, and that it performs well in discriminating species in regions where floristic diversity is highest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.