Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28072817›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

Drosophila Clock Is Required in Brain Pacemaker Neurons to Prevent Premature Locomotor Aging Independently of Its Circadian Function.

Alexandra Vaccaro, Abdul-Raouf Issa, Laurent Seugnet, Serge Birman, André Klarsfeld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sleep regulation inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Natural variation in age-related dopamine neuron degeneration is glutathione dependent and linked to life span.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra VaccaroGenes Circuits Rhythms and Neuropathology, Brain Plasticity Unit, ESPCI Paris/CNRS, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3183-7343
Abdul-Raouf IssaGenes Circuits Rhythms and Neuropathology, Brain Plasticity Unit, ESPCI Paris/CNRS, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Laurent SeugnetIntegrated Physiology of the Brain Arousal Systems (WAKING), Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM/CNRS/UCBL1, Lyon, France.
Serge BirmanGenes Circuits Rhythms and Neuropathology, Brain Plasticity Unit, ESPCI Paris/CNRS, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4278-454X
André KlarsfeldGenes Circuits Rhythms and Neuropathology, Brain Plasticity Unit, ESPCI Paris/CNRS, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian clocks control many self-sustained rhythms in physiology and behavior with approximately 24-hour periodicity. In many organisms, oxidative stress and aging negatively impact the circadian system and sleep. Conversely, loss of the clock decreases resistance to oxidative stress, and may reduce lifespan and speed up brain aging and neurodegeneration. Here we examined the effects of clock disruptions on locomotor aging and longevity in Drosophila. We found that lifespan was similarly reduced in three arrhythmic mutants (ClkAR, cyc0 and tim0) and in wild-type flies under constant light, which stops the clock. In contrast, ClkAR mutants showed significantly faster age-related locomotor deficits (as monitored by startle-induced climbing) than cyc0 and tim0, or than control flies under constant light. Reactive oxygen species accumulated more with age in ClkAR mutant brains, but this did not appear to contribute to the accelerated locomotor decline of the mutant. Clk, but not Cyc, inactivation by RNA interference in the pigment-dispersing factor (PDF)-expressing central pacemaker neurons led to similar loss of climbing performance as ClkAR. Conversely, restoring Clk function in these cells was sufficient to rescue the ClkAR locomotor phenotype, independently of behavioral rhythmicity. Accelerated locomotor decline of the ClkAR mutant required expression of the PDF receptor and correlated to an apparent loss of dopaminergic neurons in the posterior protocerebral lateral 1 (PPL1) clusters. This neuronal loss was rescued when the ClkAR mutation was placed in an apoptosis-deficient background. Impairing dopamine synthesis in a single pair of PPL1 neurons that innervate the mushroom bodies accelerated locomotor decline in otherwise wild-type flies. Our results therefore reveal a novel circadian-independent requirement for Clk in brain circadian neurons to maintain a subset of dopaminergic cells and avoid premature locomotor aging in Drosophila.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsARNTL Transcription FactorsBrainCircadian RhythmCLOCK ProteinsDopaminergic NeuronsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsLocomotionReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledARNTL Transcription FactorsClk protein, DrosophilaCLOCK Proteinscyc protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsPDFR protein, DrosophilaReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledtim protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID28072817
PMCPMC5224980
OpenAlexW2568172177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.