Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28072816›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

Systematic Analysis of Transcriptional and Post-transcriptional Regulation of Metabolism in Yeast.

Emanuel Gonçalves, Zrinka Raguz Nakic, Mattia Zampieri, Omar Wagih, David Ochoa, Uwe Sauer, Pedro Beltrao, Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Disentangling the roles of aneuploidy, chromosomal instability and tumour heterogeneity in developing resistance to cancer therapies.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multiscale dynamic modeling and simulation of a biorefinery.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2019
    Article
  11. Footprint-based functional analysis of multiomic data.Current opinion in systems biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emanuel GonçalvesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9967-5205
Zrinka Raguz NakicDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8670-699X
Mattia ZampieriDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Omar WagihEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2162-0431
David OchoaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1857-278X
Uwe SauerDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pedro BeltraoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-7703
Julio Saez-RodriguezEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8552-8976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells react to extracellular perturbations with complex and intertwined responses. Systematic identification of the regulatory mechanisms that control these responses is still a challenge and requires tailored analyses integrating different types of molecular data. Here we acquired time-resolved metabolomics measurements in yeast under salt and pheromone stimulation and developed a machine learning approach to explore regulatory associations between metabolism and signal transduction. Existing phosphoproteomics measurements under the same conditions and kinase-substrate regulatory interactions were used to in silico estimate the enzymatic activity of signalling kinases. Our approach identified informative associations between kinases and metabolic enzymes capable of predicting metabolic changes. We extended our analysis to two studies containing transcriptomics, phosphoproteomics and metabolomics measurements across a comprehensive panel of kinases/phosphatases knockouts and time-resolved perturbations to the nitrogen metabolism. Changes in activity of transcription factors, kinases and phosphatases were estimated in silico and these were capable of building predictive models to infer the metabolic adaptations of previously unseen conditions across different dynamic experiments. Time-resolved experiments were significantly more informative than genetic perturbations to infer metabolic adaptation. This difference may be due to the indirect nature of the associations and of general cellular states that can hinder the identification of causal relationships. This work provides a novel genome-scale integrative analysis to propose putative transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms of metabolic processes.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, FungalMetabolomicsPheromonesProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSodium ChlorideSystems BiologyTranscription FactorsPheromonesProteinsSodium ChlorideTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28072816
PMCPMC5224888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.