Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28072717›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

Clinics, prognosis and new therapeutic options in patients with mucosal melanoma: A retrospective analysis of 75 patients.

Tim Schaefer, Imke Satzger, Ralf Gutzmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mucosal Melanoma: An Overview of Recent Therapies.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026
    Review
  4. Survival and prognostic factors in mucosal melanomas of the oral cavity: A meta-analysis.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Clinicopathological features and prognosis of anorectal melanoma: A report of 68 cases].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Malignant melanoma of gastrointestinal tract onAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic Roles ofCells · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim SchaeferDepartment for Dermatology and Allergy, Skin Cancer Center Hannover (HTZH), Hannover Medical School Office for Dermatology, Allergy and Venerology, Seelze, Germany.
Imke Satzger
Ralf Gutzmer
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECreative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal melanomas represent a rare entity with different risk factors and molecular features compared to cutaneous melanomas. They arise most commonly from mucosal surfaces in the head/neck region, the female genital tract (FGT) and the anorectal region. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinics, prognosis, and treatment options of patients with mucosal melanoma, in particular with regard to different primary sites.We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with mucosal melanomas diagnosed in the years 1993 to 2015 in our department. The primary melanomas were located in the head/neck region (n = 32), the FGT (n = 24), and the anorectal region (n = 19).The median age of the patients was 66 years. At initial diagnosis the primary melanoma was not completely resectable in 11 (15%) patients, 18 (24%) patients had regional lymph node metastases, and 7 (9%) patients distant metastases. During follow-up, 22 (29%) patients suffered from a local recurrence, in particular patients with primary melanoma in the head/neck region without postoperative radiotherapy. By multivariate analysis location of the primary melanoma in the head/neck area or anorectal region and presence of metastases at time of diagnosis represented poor prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. In 62 tested individuals 7 KIT mutations were found, 2 BRAF mutations in 57 tested patients. Four patients received targeted therapies, 14 checkpoint inhibitors, 4 (1/1 on vemurafenib, 1/7 on ipilimumab, and 2/7 on PD-1 inhibitors) patients showed responses of more than 100 days duration.Mucosal melanomas are often locally advanced or metastatic at initial diagnosis, thus they require extensive staging procedures. The high rate of local recurrences in the head/neck region can be significantly reduced by postoperative radiotherapy. For the potential use of medical treatment a mutation analysis for KIT and BRAF genes should be performed. The use of new immunologic and targeted therapies has to be further evaluated.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsAnus NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansIndolesIntestinal MucosaIpilimumabLymphatic MetastasisAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBRAF protein, humanIndolesIpilimumabPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitSulfonamidesVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID28072717
PMCPMC5228677
OpenAlexW2570819007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.