Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28072692›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2017

Role of biochemistry and cytological analysis of cyst fluid for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: A retrospective cohort study.

Ozlem Mutluay Soyer, Bulent Baran, Asli Ciftcibasi Ormeci, Davut Sahin, Suut Gokturk, Sami Evirgen, Rafet Basar, Pinar Firat, Filiz Akyuz, Kadir Demir and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating the prognostic efficacy of biomarkers in pancreatic cyst fluid.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Pancreatic Incidentaloma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ozlem Mutluay SoyerDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology Department of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bulent Baran
Asli Ciftcibasi Ormeci
Davut Sahin
Suut Gokturk
Sami Evirgen
Rafet Basar
Pinar Firat
Filiz Akyuz
Kadir Demir
Fatih Besisik
Sabahattin Kaymakoglu
Cetin Karaca
Laboratoire de Mesure du Carbone 14 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of pancreatic cysts is based on neoplastic-nonneoplastic discrimination. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) enables to differentiate neoplastic-nonneoplastic lesions and also allows fine-needle aspiration (FNA). In this study, we aim to assess feasibility and clinical relevance of cytological and biochemical analysis in differential diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions in patients who had undergone endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) due to pancreatic cysts.

methodsParticipants were 96 patients who had undergone EUS-FNA for differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. Pancreatic cysts were classified as benign-mucinous, nonmucinous, and malignant according to patient history, physical examination, EUS appearance, and cystic fluid assessment. Tumor markers (CEA, CA(cancer antigens) 72.4, CA 19-9) , amylase, lipase and cytological assesment were compared between 3 different groups. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed to identify appropriate cut-off values.

resultsFluid CEA and CA 72.4 levels for benign-mucinous and malignant cysts were significantly higher than for nonmucinous cysts (P ≤ 0.04). A cut-off CEA level of 207 ng/mL differentiated mucinous etiology with a sensitivity of 72.7%, specificity of 97.7%, and accuracy of 89.5%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CA 72.4 cut-off level of 3.32 ng/mL were 80%, 69.5%, and 73.6%, respectively.

conclusionCyst fluid CEA and CA 72.4 levels have a high accuracy in discriminating mucinous from nonmucinous cysts. When combined with cytology their accuracy rate increases.

Indexed as

Cyst FluidPancreatic CystPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBiomarkers, TumorCA-72-4 antigenCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID28072692
PMCPMC5228652
OpenAlexW2570723343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.