Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28072558›Full record

ArticleTranscription2017

A link between transcription fidelity and pausing in vivo.

Pamela Gamba, Katherine James, Nikolay Zenkin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transcription, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanisms of Transcriptional Pausing in Bacteria.Journal of molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Transcription fidelity and its roles in the cell.Current opinion in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pamela Gambaa Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology , Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK.
Katherine Jamesa Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology , Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK.
Nikolay Zenkina Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology , Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK.
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I004564/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J006378/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pausing by RNA polymerase is a major mechanism that regulates transcription elongation but can cause conflicts with fellow RNA polymerases and other cellular machineries. Here, we summarize our recent finding that misincorporation could be a major source of transcription pausing in vivo, and discuss the role of misincorporation-induced pausing.

Indexed as

DNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsTranscriptional Elongation FactorsTranscription Elongation, GeneticTranscription FactorsdksA protein, E coliDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coli ProteinsGreA protein, E coliGreB protein, E coliTranscriptional Elongation FactorsTranscription Factorscollisions of transcription with replicationfidelityGremisincorporationpausingproofreadingTFIIStranscription

Identifiers

PMID28072558
PMCPMC5423485
OpenAlexW2569354157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.