Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28071741›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Loss of Coupling Distinguishes GJB1 Mutations Associated with CNS Manifestations of CMT1X from Those Without CNS Manifestations.

Charles K Abrams, Mikhail Goman, Sarah Wong, Steven S Scherer, Kleopas A Kleopa, Alejandro Peinado, Mona M Freidin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanisms and Treatments in Demyelinating CMT.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A Novel Variant in Non-coding Region ofFrontiers in neurology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles K AbramsDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago IL, USA.
Mikhail GomanDepartment of Neurology, SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Sarah WongDepartment of Neurology, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Steven S SchererDepartment of Neurology, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kleopas A KleopaNeurology Clinics and Neuroscience Laboratory, Cyprus Institute for Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Alejandro PeinadoDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago IL, USA.
Mona M FreidinDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago IL, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USCyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics · CYSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CMT1X, an X-linked inherited neuropathy, is caused by mutations in GJB1, which codes for Cx32, a gap junction protein expressed by Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes. Many GJB1 mutations cause central nervous system (CNS) abnormality in males, including stable subclinical signs and, less often, short-duration episodes characterized by motor difficulties and altered consciousness. However, some mutations have no apparent CNS effects. What distinguishes mutations with and without CNS manifestations has been unclear. Here we studied a total of 14 Cx32 mutations, 10 of which are associated with florid episodic CNS clinical syndromes in addition to peripheral neuropathy. The other 4 mutations exhibit neuropathy without clinical or subclinical CNS abnormalities. These "PNS-only" mutations (Y151C, V181M, R183C and L239I) form gap junction plaques and produce levels of junctional coupling similar to those for wild-type Cx32. In contrast, mutants with CNS manifestations (F51L, E102del, V139M, R142Q, R142W, R164W T55I, R164Q and C168Y) either form no morphological gap junction plaques or, if they do, produce little or no detectable junctional coupling. Thus, PNS and CNS abnormalities may involve different aspects of connexin function.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCell LineCentral Nervous SystemCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseConnexinsGap Junction beta-1 ProteinHumansMutant ProteinsNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPeripheral Nervous SystemTransfectionConnexinsGap Junction beta-1 ProteinMutant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28071741
PMCPMC5223219
OpenAlexW2570378656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.