ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2017
Vulnerable carotid plaque imaging and histopathology without a dedicated MRI receiver coil.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- MR Imaging of Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis: Updated Evidence on High-Risk Plaque Features and Emerging Trends.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Review
- Reassessing the Carotid Artery Plaque "Rim Sign" on CTA: A New Analysis with Histopathologic Confirmation.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Hypothesis of "stroke-stop" formula: a tool for risk index determination in development of acute cerebrovascular disease in asymptomatic individuals with carotid stenosis.BMC neurology · 2021Article
- Cervical Carotid Plaque MRI : Review of Atherosclerosis Imaging Features and their Histologic Underpinnings.Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Review
- Inflammation and Endothelial Function Relevant Genetic Polymorphisms and Carotid Plaque in Chinese Population.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020Article
- PET/MRI of atherosclerosis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Interactions among variants inOncotarget · 2018Article
- Multi-stage deep learning architecture for carotid artery segmentation and stenosis evaluation: comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is associated with vulnerable carotid artery plaques showing specific histopathologic features, namely a lipid-rich necrotic core, intraplaque hemorrhage, ulceration, and thin fibrous cap. While ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) can identify carotid plaques and determine the extent of stenosis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides further information regarding plaque composition and morphology. In this feasibility study, three patients with symptomatic, moderately stenosed plaques were imaged with CT angiography (CTA) and MRI (3T and 1.5T) without a dedicated receiver coil. The patients subsequently underwent carotid endarterectomy with en-bloc excision of the plaque. The CT and MR images were analyzed independently by three neuroradiologists to identify vulnerable plaque features. The images were correlated with the histopathology to confirm the findings. All three patients had one or more vulnerable plaque features on histopathology. MRI allowed for better characterization of these features when compared to CTA. The pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images were most helpful for identifying the lipid-rich necrotic core and thin fibrous cap, while the time of flight-magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRA were excellent for detecting plaque hemorrhage and ulceration, respectively. The 3T images showed superior spatial and contrast resolution compared to the 1.5T images for all sequences. By providing direct correlation between imaging and histopathology, this study demonstrates that 3T MRI without a dedicated surface coil is an excellent tool for assessing plaque vulnerability. In smaller hospitals or those with limited resources, it is reasonable to consider conventional MRI for patient risk stratification. Further studies are needed to determine how MRI and plaque vulnerability can be incorporated into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.