Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28070872›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2017

Sedative Effects of Levocetirizine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Kornkiat Snidvongs, Kachorn Seresirikachorn, Likhit Khattiyawittayakun, Wirach Chitsuthipakorn

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy and Safety of Diethylcarbamazine in Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. IV Brazilian Consensus on Rhinitis - an update on allergic rhinitis.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kornkiat SnidvongsDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. drkornkiat@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-4718
Kachorn SeresirikachornDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Likhit KhattiyawittayakunDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Wirach ChitsuthipakornDepartment of Otolaryngology, Sawan Pracharak Hospital, Atthakawi Road, Tambon Paknam Pho, Amphoe Mueang Nakhon Sawan, Nakhon Sawan, 60000, Thailand.
Chulalongkorn University · THNakhon Sawan Rajabhat University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs a substrate of P-glycoprotein, levocetirizine should not cause sedative effects. However, while cetirizine, a mixture of levocetirizine and dextrocetirizine, can slightly penetrate the blood brain barrier, the sedative effects of levocetirizine are still under study.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the sedative effects of levocetirizine.

methodsAn electronic literature search was performed using Medline and EMBASE from January 01, 2001 through August 6, 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing levocetirizine with other antihistamines or placebo for patients with allergy and healthy subjects were selected. Primary outcome was risk ratio between levocetirizine and comparators. Secondary outcome was change in psychomotor speed. Data were pooled for meta-analysis using a fixed-effect model.

resultsForty-eight studies of 18,014 patients met the inclusion criteria. When compared to placebo, levocetirizine produced modest sedative effects (RR: 1.67; 95% CI 1.17, 2.38). However, when compared to other second-generation antihistamines, sedative effects of levocetirizine did not differ (RR: 1.23; 95% CI 0.96, 1.58). In subgroup analysis, there was no difference between the sedative effects of levocetirizine and fexofenadine (RR: 1.7; 95% CI 0.59, 4.88), desloratadine (RR: 1.58; 95% CI 0.9, 2.77), loratadine (RR: 1.56; 95% CI 0.28, 8.56), bilastine (RR: 1.17; 95% CI 0.48, 2.84), olopatadine (RR: 1.09; 95% CI 0.81, 1.47), azelastine (RR: 0.19; 95% CI 0.01, 3.68) and rupatadine (RR: 1.47; 95% CI 0.14, 15.72). When compared to first-generation antihistamines, levocetirizine had less sedative effects and less change of reaction time (mean difference: -250.76 s; 95% CI -338.53, -162.98).

conclusionLevocetirizine has modest sedative effects with a risk ratio of 1.67 when compared with placebo. The sedative effects observed for levocetirizine are not different from other second-generation antihistamines.

Indexed as

CetirizineHumansHypnotics and SedativesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrticariaCetirizineHypnotics and Sedativeslevocetirizine

Identifiers

PMID28070872
OpenAlexW2569502064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.