ReviewDrugs2017
Treating HIV Infection in the Central Nervous System.
Review in Drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human microglial models to study HIV infection and neuropathogenesis: a literature overview and comparative analyses.Journal of neurovirology · 2022Review
- DDRugging glioblastoma: understanding and targeting the DNA damage response to improve future therapies.Molecular oncology · 2022Review
- Permeation Challenges of Drugs for Treatment of Neurological Tuberculosis and HIV and the Application of Magneto-Electric Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Potent antiviral HIV-1 protease inhibitor combats highly drug resistant mutant PR20.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2019Article
- The Glucocorticoid Receptor Is a Critical Regulator of HIV Latency in Human Microglial Cells.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combination antiretroviral treatment is associated with clear benefits in HIV-positive subjects, and is also effective in the central nervous system (CNS), meaning HIV-associated dementia is now an uncommon event. Nevertheless, a significant number of patients show symptoms of neurocognitive impairment which may negatively affect their quality of life. Although several risk factors for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders have been identified, there is no clear recommendation for their prevention and management. In this review, the penetration of drugs into the cerebrospinal fluid/CNS is discussed as well as the viral and clinical consequences associated with higher/lower compartmental exposure. We also review the potential interventions according to the currently identified underlying mechanisms, including persistent CNS immune activation, legacy effects, low-level viral replication and escape, co-morbidities, and antiretroviral-associated direct and indirect 'neurotoxicity'. Adjunctive therapies and interventions (including neuro-rehabilitation) are then briefly discussed. The treatment of HIV infection in the CNS is a complex area of therapeutics requiring multidisciplinary interventions and further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28070871What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.