ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2017
Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners' Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Factors Influencing Overuse of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2018Pooled it
- Breast cancer screening best practices: a Canadian multidisciplinary consensus-based approach for primary care providers.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Provider effects and racial inequities in breast cancer risk-management adoption: Findings from a community-based study of high-risk women.Patient education and counseling · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening Practices Reported Via an Online Survey.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Perceived guideline clarity impacts guideline-concordant care for breast cancer screening in women age 40-49.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Rising to the De-escalation Challenge: Multilevel Change Needed to Align Clinical Practice with Cancer Screening Guidelines.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022Article
- Characteristics Associated with Low-Value Cancer Screening Among Office-Based Physician Visits by Older Adults in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Observational
- Discontinuing Cancer Screening for Older Adults: a Comparison of Clinician Decision-Making for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screenings.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Primary care provider perspectives on screening mammography in older women: A qualitative study.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Characteristics Associated with Participation in ENGAGED 2 - A Web-based Breast Cancer Risk Communication and Decision Support Trial.The Permanente journal · 2020Article
- Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020Article
- Variation in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations by Primary Care Providers Surveyed in Wisconsin.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Clinician Perspectives on Overscreening for Cancer in Older Adults With Limited Life Expectancy.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020Article
- Survey of primary care physicians' views about breast and ovarian cancer screening for true BRCA1/2 non-carriers.Journal of community genetics · 2020Article
- Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2020Article
- Linking physician attitudes to their breast cancer screening practices: A survey of US primary care providers and gynecologists.Preventive medicine · 2018Article
- Linking Reminders and Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Results From a National Survey.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2017Article
- Capsule Commentary on Haas et al., Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRevised breast cancer screening guidelines have fueled debate about the effectiveness and frequency of screening mammography, encouraging discussion between women and their providers.
objectiveTo examine whether primary care providers' (PCPs') beliefs about the effectiveness and frequency of screening mammography are associated with utilization by their patients.
designCross-sectional survey data from PCPs (2014) from three primary care networks affiliated with the Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) consortium, linked with data about their patients' mammography use (2011-2014).
participantsPCPs (n = 209) and their female patients age 40-89 years without breast cancer (n = 30,233). MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes included whether (1) women received a screening mammogram during a 2-year period; and (2) screened women had >1 mammogram during that period, reflecting annual screening. Principal independent variables were PCP beliefs about the effectiveness of mammography and their recommendations for screening frequency. KEY
resultsOverall 65.2% of women received >1 screening mammogram. For women 40-48 years, mammography use was modestly lower for those cared for by PCPs who believed that screening was ineffective compared with those who believed it was somewhat or very effective (59.1%, 62.3%, and 64.7%; p = 0.019 after controlling for patient characteristics). Of women with PCPs who reported they did not recommend screening before age 50, 48.1% were nonetheless screened. For women age 49-74 years, the vast majority were cared for by providers who believed that screening was effective. Provider recommendations were not associated with screening frequency. For women ≥75 years, those cared for by providers who were uncertain about effectiveness had higher screening use (50.7%) than those cared for by providers who believed it was somewhat effective (42.8%). Patients of providers who did not recommend screening were less likely to be screened than were those whose providers recommended annual screening, yet 37.1% of patients whose providers recommended against screening still received screening.
conclusionsPCP beliefs about mammography effectiveness and screening recommendations are only modestly associated with use, suggesting other likely influences on patient participation in mammography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.