ArticleEcology and evolution2017
An exception to the matched filter hypothesis: A mismatch of male call frequency and female best hearing frequency in a torrent frog.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Size matters: individual variation in auditory sensitivity may influence sexual selection in Pacific treefrogs (Pseudacris regilla).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024Article
- Peripheral hearing sensitivity is similar between the sexes in a benthic turtle species despite the larger body size of males.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Parasite defensive limb movements enhance acoustic signal attraction in male little torrent frogs.eLife · 2022Article
- Geographic variation in the matching between call characteristics and tympanic sensitivity in the Weeping lizard.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020Article
- A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019Article
- Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Sometimes noise is beneficial: stream noise informs vocal communication in the little torrent frogJournal of ethology · 2017Article
- An exception to the matched filter hypothesis: A mismatch of male call frequency and female best hearing frequency in a torrent frog.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The matched filter hypothesis proposes that the tuning of auditory sensitivity and the spectral character of calls will match in order to maximize auditory processing efficiency during courtship. In this study, we analyzed the acoustic structure of male calls and both male and female hearing sensitivities in the little torrent frog (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.