Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28070148›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2017

Comparison of the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic and nontraumatic rotator cuff tears.

Takeshi Teratani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Traumatic and Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears Have the Same Rates of Healing.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Effectiveness of simultaneous versus delayed repair of combined full-thickness rotator cuff rupture in proximal humerus fracture].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Takeshi TerataniOuryouji Orthopaedic Hospital, 162 Hosono,Kobayashi, Miyazaki 886-0004, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic and nontraumatic rotator cuff tears.

methodsThirty-three patients with traumatic and 46 with nontraumatic rotator cuff tears were included.

resultsThe rate of injury to the long head of the biceps was significantly higher in the traumatic group. Preoperative active forward elevation was significantly lower in the traumatic group.

conclusionThe outcomes of both groups were good. This may have been because milder preoperative muscle atrophy and a shorter duration of symptoms were observed in the traumatic group.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyLong head of bicepsNon-traumatic rotator cuff tearRange of motionTraumatic rotator cuff tear

Identifiers

PMID28070148
PMCPMC5219609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.