Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28069958›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Properdin binding to complement activating surfaces depends on initial C3b deposition.

Morten Harboe, Christina Johnson, Stig Nymo, Karin Ekholt, Camilla Schjalm, Julie K Lindstad, Anne Pharo, Bernt Christian Hellerud, Kristina Nilsson Ekdahl, Tom Eirik Mollnes and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Morten HarboeDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Christina JohnsonDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Stig NymoResearch Laboratory, Nordland Hospital, 8092 Bodo, Norway.
Karin EkholtDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Camilla SchjalmDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Julie K LindstadDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Anne PharoDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Bernt Christian HellerudDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Kristina Nilsson EkdahlDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory C5:3, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Tom Eirik MollnesDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Per H NilssonDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway; per.nilsson@rr-research.no.ORCID 0000-0002-7192-5794
Oslo University Hospital · NONordland Hospital · NOUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two functions have been assigned to properdin; stabilization of the alternative convertase, C3bBb, is well accepted, whereas the role of properdin as pattern recognition molecule is controversial. The presence of nonphysiological aggregates in purified properdin preparations and experimental models that do not allow discrimination between the initial binding of properdin and binding secondary to C3b deposition is a critical factor contributing to this controversy. In previous work, by inhibiting C3, we showed that properdin binding to zymosan and Escherichia coli is not a primary event, but rather is solely dependent on initial C3 deposition. In the present study, we found that properdin in human serum bound dose-dependently to solid-phase myeloperoxidase. This binding was dependent on C3 activation, as demonstrated by the lack of binding in human serum with the C3-inhibitor compstatin Cp40, in C3-depleted human serum, or when purified properdin is applied in buffer. Similarly, binding of properdin to the surface of human umbilical vein endothelial cells or Neisseria meningitidis after incubation with human serum was completely C3-dependent, as detected by flow cytometry. Properdin, which lacks the structural homology shared by other complement pattern recognition molecules and has its major function in stabilizing the C3bBb convertase, was found to bind both exogenous and endogenous molecular patterns in a completely C3-dependent manner. We therefore challenge the view of properdin as a pattern recognition molecule, and argue that the experimental conditions used to test this hypothesis should be carefully considered, with emphasis on controlling initial C3 activation under physiological conditions.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedComplement ActivationComplement C3bGranulocytesHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsNeisseria meningitidisPeptides, CyclicPeroxidaseProperdinSerumComplement C3bcompstatinPeptides, CyclicPeroxidaseProperdinC3complementmyeloperoxidaseNeisseria meningitidisproperdin

Identifiers

PMID28069958
PMCPMC5278493
OpenAlexW2568312410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.