Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28069761›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2017

Functional and Quantitative MRI Mapping of Somatomotor Representations of Human Supralaryngeal Vocal Tract.

Daniel Carey, Saloni Krishnan, Martina F Callaghan, Martin I Sereno, Frederic Dick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The speech neuroprosthesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology and the Communication Sciences.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Review
  11. Topological Maps and Brain Computations From Low to High.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Singers show enhanced performance and neural representation of vocal imitation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Imperfect spoiling in variable flip angle TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Mapping Human Laryngeal Motor Cortex during Vocalization.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Subthalamic Nucleus and Sensorimotor Cortex Activity During Speech Production.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel CareyDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, TW20 0EX, UK.
Saloni KrishnanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet St, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.
Martina F CallaghanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Martin I SerenoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet St, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.
Frederic DickDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet St, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400341Medical Research Council G0700399Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech articulation requires precise control of and coordination between the effectors of the vocal tract (e.g., lips, tongue, soft palate, and larynx). However, it is unclear how the cortex represents movements of and contact between these effectors during speech, or how these cortical responses relate to inter-regional anatomical borders. Here, we used phase-encoded fMRI to map somatomotor representations of speech articulations. Phonetically trained participants produced speech phones, progressing from front (bilabial) to back (glottal) place of articulation. Maps of cortical myelin proxies (R1 = 1/T1) further allowed us to situate functional maps with respect to anatomical borders of motor and somatosensory regions. Across participants, we found a consistent topological map of place of articulation, spanning the central sulcus and primary motor and somatosensory areas, that moved from lateral to inferior as place of articulation progressed from front to back. Phones produced at velar and glottal places of articulation activated the inferior aspect of the central sulcus, but with considerable across-subject variability. R1 maps for a subset of participants revealed that articulator maps extended posteriorly into secondary somatosensory regions. These results show consistent topological organization of cortical representations of the vocal apparatus in the context of speech behavior.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansLaryngeal NervesLarynxLipMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysPalate, SoftTongueYoung AdultmappingMRIsomatomotorspeechvocal tract

Identifiers

PMID28069761
PMCPMC5808730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.