Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28069598›Full record

Trial reportAlcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)2017

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Intervention by Interactive Voice Response.

Gail L Rose, Gary J Badger, Joan M Skelly, Charles D MacLean, Tonya A Ferraro, John E Helzer

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gail L RoseDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Vermont, USA.
Gary J BadgerDepartment of Medical Biostatistics, The University of Vermont, 27 Hills Building, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Joan M SkellyDepartment of Medical Biostatistics, The University of Vermont, 27 Hills Building, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Charles D MacLeanDepartment of Medicine, The University of Vermont, College of Medicine, 4S Given Courtyard, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Tonya A FerraroDepartment of Research Administrative Services, Harvard University, USA.
John E HelzerDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Vermont, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine the effect of an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) brief intervention (BI) to reduce alcohol consumption among adults seeking primary care.

methodsPatients (N = 1855) with unhealthy drinking were recruited from eight academic internal medicine and family medicine clinics and randomized to IVR-BI (n = 938) versus No IVR-BI control (n = 917). Daily alcohol consumption was assessed at baseline, 3- and 6-months using the Timeline Followback.

resultsThe IVR-BI was completed by 95% of the 938 patients randomized to that condition, and 62% of them indicated a willingness to consider a change in their drinking. Participants in both conditions significantly reduced consumption over time, but changes were not different between groups. Regardless of condition, participants with alcohol use disorder (AUD) showed significant decreases in drinking outcomes. No significant changes were observed in patients without AUD, regardless of condition.

conclusionAlthough the IVR intervention was well accepted by patients, there was no evidence that IVR-BI was superior to No IVR-BI for reducing drinking in the subsequent 6 months. Because both the design and the intervention tested were novel, we cannot say definitively why this particular eHealth treatment lacked efficacy. It could be useful to evaluate the effect of the pre-randomization assessment alone on change in drinking. The high treatment engagement rate and successful implementation protocol are strengths, and can be adopted for future trials. SHORT SUMMARY: We examined the efficacy of a novel BI for patient self-administration by automated telephone. Alcohol consumption decreased over time but there were no between-group changes in consumption. Regardless of treatment condition, participants with alcohol use disorder (AUD) showed significant reduction in drinking but participants without AUD showed no change.

Indexed as

Cell Phone UseAdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismEarly Medical InterventionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceTelemedicineYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28069598
PMCPMC5397878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.