Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28069561›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2017

Cancer Survivors' Experience With Telehealth: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

Anna Cox, Grace Lucas, Afrodita Marcu, Marianne Piano, Wendy Grosvenor, Freda Mold, Roma Maguire, Emma Ream

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03883243 (Monitoring and Telecoaching of Physical Activity in Patients With Stage III and IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 175 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03883243 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Monitoring and Telecoaching of Physical Activity in Patients With Stage III and IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2019 to 2020Enrolled32ConditionsExercise, NeoplasmsArmsTelecoaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of psychosocial interventions on cancer-related fatigue in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Experiences of patients and providers while using telemedicine in cancer care during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Digital Patient Experience: Umbrella Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Virtual Reality as a Promising Tool Supporting Oncological Treatment in Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Psycho-oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Effectiveness of Internet-based interventions in managing chemotherapy-related symptoms in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. 'Making a connection': a qualitative study of experiences from a cancer telerehabilitation program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna CoxSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5254-1296
Grace LucasSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5941-5233
Afrodita MarcuSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-3417
Marianne PianoSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0714-6339
Wendy GrosvenorSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5529-7022
Freda MoldSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-5537
Roma MaguireSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4289-2433
Emma ReamSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5436-8036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNet survival rates of cancer are increasing worldwide, placing a strain on health service provision. There is a drive to transfer the care of cancer survivors-individuals living with and beyond cancer-to the community and encourage them to play an active role in their own care. Telehealth, the use of technology in remote exchange of data and communication between patients and health care professionals (HCPs), is an important contributor to this evolving model of care. Telehealth interventions are "complex," and understanding patient experiences of them is important in evaluating their impact. However, a wider view of patient experience is lacking as qualitative studies detailing cancer survivor engagement with telehealth are yet to be synthesized.

objectiveTo systematically identify, appraise, and synthesize qualitative research evidence on the experiences of adult cancer survivors participating in telehealth interventions, to characterize the patient experience of telehealth interventions for this group.

methodsMedline (PubMed), PsychINFO, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Professionals (CINAHL), Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched on August 14, 2015, and March 8, 2016, for English-language papers published between 2006 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were as follows: adult cancer survivors aged 18 years and over, cancer diagnosis, experience of participating in a telehealth intervention (defined as remote communication or remote monitoring with an HCP delivered by telephone, Internet, or hand-held or mobile technology), and reporting qualitative data including verbatim quotes. An adapted Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative research was used to assess paper quality. The results section of each included article was coded line by line, and all papers underwent inductive analysis, involving comparison, reexamination, and grouping of codes to develop descriptive themes. Analytical themes were developed through an iterative process of reflection on, and interpretation of, the descriptive themes within and across studies.

resultsAcross the 22 included papers, 3 analytical themes emerged, each with 3 descriptive subthemes: (1) influence of telehealth on the disrupted lives of cancer survivors (convenience, independence, and burden); (2) personalized care across physical distance (time, space, and the human factor); and (3) remote reassurance-a safety net of health care professional connection (active connection, passive connection, and slipping through the net). Telehealth interventions represent a convenient approach, which can potentially minimize treatment burden and disruption to cancer survivors' lives. Telehealth interventions can facilitate an experience of personalized care and reassurance for those living with and beyond cancer; however, it is important to consider individual factors when tailoring interventions to ensure engagement promotes benefit rather than burden.

conclusionsTelehealth interventions can provide cancer survivors with independence and reassurance. Future telehealth interventions need to be developed iteratively in collaboration with a broad range of cancer survivors to maximize engagement and benefit.

Indexed as

InternetTelemedicineAdultHumansNeoplasmsPatient PreferencePatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchSurvivorsneoplasmspatient preferencepatient satisfactionsurvivalsystematic reviewtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID28069561
PMCPMC5259589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.