ArticleContraception2017
Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.
Article in Contraception, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 106 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Health workers' values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review.Contraception · 2022Pooled it
- Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- "Now that they come to our doorsteps to teach us these things…" - Postpartum contraception outcomes from a pre-post effectiveness-implementation study of an integrated community health worker intervention in rural Nepal.Reproductive health · 2025Trial
- Trial
- The impact of a physician's recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference-sensitivity and personal motives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Evaluating Reproductive Health Recommendations in CPGs for Sickle Cell Disease: An Umbrella Review.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026Article
- "Do not leave me behind and do not put me in your box": family-planning access and care needs among women with migration histories in Berlin, Germany-a mixed-methods study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Development of a gynecologic examination satisfaction scale: A scale development study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Latina Immigrants' Experiences Accessing Contraceptive Services Beyond the Postpartum Period and the Role of Community and Pediatric Settings.Qualitative health research · 2026Article
- "I liked having my voice heard:" a feasible, rapid approach for codesigning a contraceptive counseling curriculum.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2026Article
- Family planning service quality and contraceptive discontinuation among short-acting contraceptive users in Indonesia: a survival analysis of the 2017 Indonesia demographic health survey.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Three-Year Contraceptive Failure Rates During the HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Understanding clients' and providers' perspectives on the implementation of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) for self-injection programming in Nigeria.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Co-design of a digital health intervention to provide pharmacy-based, person-centered contraceptive decision support for youth in Kenya.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Towards collaborative tinkering in contraceptive consultations: Negotiating side-effects in contraceptive care.Health (London, England : 1997) · 2026Article
- CHOICE-AYA: adapting an evidence-based contraceptive counseling intervention for adolescents and young adults experiencing homelessness.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Multipurpose vaginal rings: preferences from a national discrete choice experiment survey among US women.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Trust, autonomy, and informed consent: a qualitative investigation of youth experiences accessing contraception in Canada.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundShared decision making (SDM) is a potentially valuable but underexplored approach to contraceptive counseling.
methodsWe determined the correlation between patient report of SDM and of whether their provider had a method preference with measures of satisfaction.
resultsWomen reporting SDM were more likely to be satisfied with counseling than those reporting a provider-driven decision and were more likely to be satisfied with their method than those reporting a patient-driven decision. Patients who felt that the provider had a method preference were less likely to be satisfied with their method.
conclusionsSDM in contraceptive counseling is associated with patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.