ArticleVaccine2017
Ex vivo antigen-pulsed PBMCs generate potent and long lasting immunity to infection when administered as a vaccine.
Article in Vaccine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- CD47 peptide-cloaked lipid nanoparticles promote cell-specific mRNA delivery.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Fibrocytes: A Critical Review and Practical Guide.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated that administration of antigen (Ag)-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) is an effective strategy for enhancing immunity to tumors and infectious disease organisms. However, the generation and/or isolation of DCs can require substantial time and expense. Therefore, using inactivated F. tularensis (iFt) Ag as a model immunogen, we first sought to determine if DCs could be replaced with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) during the ex-vivo pulse phase and still provide protection against Ft infection. Follow up studies were then conducted using the S. pneumoniae (Sp) vaccine Prevnar ®13 as the Ag in the pulse phase followed by immunization and Sp challenge. In both cases, we demonstrate that PBMCs can be used in place of DCs when pulsing with iFt and/or Prevnar ®13 ex vivo and re-administering the Ag-pulsed PBMCs as a vaccine. In addition, utilization of the i.n. route for Ag-pulsed PBMC administration is superior to use of the i.v. route in the case of Sp immunization, as well as when compared to direct injection of Prevnar ®13 vaccine i.m. or i.n. Furthermore, this PBMC-based vaccine strategy provides a more marked and enduring protective immune response and is also capable of serving as a multi-organism vaccine platform. The potential for this ex-vivo vaccine strategy to provide a simpler, less time consuming, and less expensive approach to DC-based vaccines and vaccination in general is also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.