Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28069289›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2017

Liquid Biopsy Analysis of FGFR3 and PIK3CA Hotspot Mutations for Disease Surveillance in Bladder Cancer.

Emil Christensen, Karin Birkenkamp-Demtröder, Iver Nordentoft, Søren Høyer, Kirstin van der Keur, Kim van Kessel, Ellen Zwarthoff, Mads Agerbæk, Torben Falck Ørntoft, Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: towards precision oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Molecular Residual Disease Testing in Genitourinary Cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emil ChristensenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karin Birkenkamp-DemtröderDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Iver NordentoftDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren HøyerDepartment of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kirstin van der KeurDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kim van KesselDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ellen ZwarthoffDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mads AgerbækDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Torben Falck ØrntoftDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jørgen Bjerggaard JensenDepartment of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars DyrskjøtDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: lars@clin.au.dk.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisease surveillance in patients with bladder cancer is important for early diagnosis of progression and metastasis and for optimised treatment.

objectiveTo develop urine and plasma assays for disease surveillance for patients with FGFR3 and PIK3CA tumour mutations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsDroplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assays were developed and tumour DNA from two patient cohorts was screened for FGFR3 and PIK3CA hotspot mutations. One cohort included 363 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The other cohort included 468 patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy (Cx). Urine supernatants (NMIBC n=216, Cx n=27) and plasma samples (NMIBC n=39, Cx n=27) from patients harbouring mutations were subsequently screened using ddPCR assays. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were measured. Fisher's exact test, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Cox regression analysis were applied. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 36% of the NMIBC patients (129/363) and 11% of the Cx patients (44/403) harboured at least one FGFR3 or PIK3CA mutation. Screening of DNA from serial urine supernatants from the NMIBC cohort revealed that high levels of tumour DNA (tDNA) were associated with later disease progression in NMIBC (p=0.003). Furthermore, high levels of tDNA in plasma samples were associated with recurrence in the Cx cohort (p=0.016). A positive correlation between tDNA levels in urine and plasma was observed (correlation coefficient 0.6). The retrospective study design and low volumes of plasma available for analysis were limitations of the study.

conclusionsIncreased levels of FGFR3 and PIK3CA mutated DNA in urine and plasma are indicative of later progression and metastasis in bladder cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY: Urine and plasma from patients with bladder cancer may be monitored for diagnosis of progression and metastasis using mutation assays.

Indexed as

MutationAgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCystectomyDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFGFR3 protein, humanPIK3CA protein, humanReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3BiomarkerCell-free DNADroplet digital polymerase chain reactionFGFR3Liquid biopsyPersonalised analysisPIK3CA

Identifiers

PMID28069289
OpenAlexW2568815887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.