Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28069045›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Improving Nursing Home Care through Feedback On PerfoRMance Data (INFORM): Protocol for a cluster-randomized trial.

Matthias Hoben, Peter G Norton, Liane R Ginsburg, Ruth A Anderson, Greta G Cummings, Holly J Lanham, Janet E Squires, Deanne Taylor, Adrian S Wagg, Carole A Estabrooks

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02695836 (Improving Nursing Home Care Through Feedback On PerfoRMance Data), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02695836 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Nursing Home Care Through Feedback On PerfoRMance Data (INFORM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2016 to 2019Enrolled119ConditionsOrganizational ContextArmsInitial face-to-face dissemination workshop, Face-to-face goal setting workshop, Virtual support workshops, Face-to-face support workshops, On-demand email and telephone support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias HobenFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. mhoben@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-315X
Peter G NortonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Liane R GinsburgFaculty of Health, York University, School of Health Policy and Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruth A AndersonSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Greta G CummingsFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Holly J LanhamDepartment of Medicine and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas, Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Janet E SquiresSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Deanne TaylorInterior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Adrian S WaggFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Carole A EstabrooksFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAInterior Health · CAThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Ottawa · CAYork University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAudit and feedback is effective in improving the quality of care. However, methods and results of international studies are heterogeneous, and studies have been criticized for a lack of systematic use of theory. In TREC (Translating Research in Elder Care), a longitudinal health services research program, we collect comprehensive data from care providers and residents in Canadian nursing homes to improve quality of care and life of residents, and quality of worklife of caregivers. The study aims are to a) systematically feed back TREC research data to nursing home care units, and b) compare the effectiveness of three different theory-based feedback strategies in improving performance within care units.

methodsINFORM (Improving Nursing Home Care through Feedback On PerfoRMance Data) is a 3.5-year pragmatic, three-arm, parallel, cluster-randomized trial. We will randomize 67 Western Canadian nursing homes with 203 care units to the three study arms, a standard feedback strategy and two assisted and goal-directed feedback strategies. Interventions will target care unit managerial teams. They are based on theory and evidence related to audit and feedback, goal setting, complex adaptive systems, and empirical work on feeding back research results. The primary outcome is the increased number of formal interactions (e.g., resident rounds or family conferences) involving care aides - non-registered caregivers providing up to 80% of direct care. Secondary outcomes are a) other modifiable features of care unit context (improved feedback, social capital, slack time) b) care aides' quality of worklife (improved psychological empowerment, job satisfaction), c) more use of best practices, and d) resident outcomes based on the Resident Assessment Instrument - Minimum Data Set 2.0. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after the 12-month intervention period, and 18 months post intervention. DISCUSSION: INFORM is the first study to systematically assess the effectiveness of different strategies to feed back research data to nursing home care units in order to improve their performance. Results of this study will enable development of a practical, sustainable, effective, and cost-effective feedback strategy for routine use by managers, policy makers and researchers. The results may also be generalizable to care settings other than nursing homes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02695836 . Date of registration: 24 February 2016.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsNursing HomesQuality of Health CareAgedFeedbackHumansAudit and FeedbackClinical MicrosystemsCluster Randomized Controlled TrialNursing HomesPerformanceQuality ImprovementQuality of Care

Identifiers

PMID28069045
PMCPMC5223357
OpenAlexW2569154173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.