Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28069021›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2017

Preoperative optimization of patient expectations improves long-term outcome in heart surgery patients: results of the randomized controlled PSY-HEART trial.

Winfried Rief, Meike C Shedden-Mora, Johannes A C Laferton, Charlotte Auer, Keith J Petrie, Stefan Salzmann, Manfred Schedlowski, Rainer Moosdorf

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01407055 phase2completednot on this map

Clinical Applications of Placebo Research: Optimizing Expectation Effects in Cardiac Surgery Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2011 to 2015Enrolled124ConditionsCoronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG), Patients' Expectations, Coronary Heart DiseaseArmsExpectation Manipulation Intervention, Supportive Therapy
NCT04502121 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Optimization of Cardiac Valve Patients' Expectations - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2020 to 2023Enrolled89ConditionsCardiac Valve DiseaseArmsEXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations
NCT04669379 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Optimization of Patient's Expectations by the Use of an Online-Tool - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2021 to 2022Enrolled29ConditionsPatients Undergoing SurgeryArmsEXPECT: Preoperative optimization of patient's expectations
NCT05557526 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing Quality of Life by Improved Patient Expectation Following Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation

TypeinterventionalSponsorEvangelical Hospital DüsseldorfRan2022 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsExpectation optimization
NCT07388004 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Rewiring Expectations and Amplifying Rewards: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanism-Based Group Psychotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2025 to 2028Enrolled150ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)ArmsExpectation-Focused Psychotherapeutic Intervention, Reward Enhancement and Activation Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Psychological interventions for acute pain after open heart surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Changing Mindsets About Side Effects of the COVID-19 Vaccination: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Winfried RiefDivision of Clinical Psychology, University of Marburg, Gutenbergstrasse 18, Marburg, 35032, Germany. rief@uni-marburg.de.
Meike C Shedden-MoraDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes A C LafertonDivision of Clinical Psychology, University of Marburg, Gutenbergstrasse 18, Marburg, 35032, Germany.
Charlotte AuerDivision of Clinical Psychology, University of Marburg, Gutenbergstrasse 18, Marburg, 35032, Germany.
Keith J PetrieDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Stefan SalzmannDivision of Clinical Psychology, University of Marburg, Gutenbergstrasse 18, Marburg, 35032, Germany.
Manfred SchedlowskiInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Rainer MoosdorfDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Vessel Surgery, Heart Centre, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEEssen University Hospital · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlacebo effects contribute substantially to outcome in most fields of medicine. While clinical trials typically try to control or minimize these effects, the potential of placebo mechanisms to improve outcome is rarely used. Patient expectations about treatment efficacy and outcome are major mechanisms that contribute to these placebo effects. We aimed to optimize these expectations to improve outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

methodsIn a prospective three-arm randomized clinical trial with a 6 month follow-up, 124 patients scheduled for CABG surgery were randomized to either a brief psychological pre-surgery intervention to optimize outcome expectations (EXPECT); or a psychological control intervention focusing on emotional support and general advice, but not on expectations (SUPPORT); or to standard medical care (SMC). Interventions were kept brief to be feasible with a heart surgery environment; "dose" of therapy was identical for both pre-surgery interventions. Primary outcome was disability 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes comprised further clinical and immunological variables.

resultsPatients in the EXPECT group showed significantly larger improvements in disability (-12.6; -17.6 to -7.5) than the SMC group (-1.9; -6.6 to +2.7); patients in the SUPPORT group (-6.7; -11.8 to 1.7) did not differ from the SMC group. Comparing follow-up scores and controlling for baseline scores of EXPECT versus SUPPORT on the variable disability only revealed a trend in favor of the EXPECT group (P = 0.09). Specific advantages for EXPECT compared to SUPPORT were found for mental quality of life and fitness for work (hours per week). Both psychological pre-surgery interventions induced less pronounced increases in pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations reflected by decreased interleukin-8 levels post-surgery compared to changes in SMC patients and lower interleukin-6 levels in patients of the EXPECT group at follow-up. Both pre-surgery interventions were characterized by great patient acceptability and no adverse effects were attributed to them. Considering the innovative nature of this approach, replication in larger, multicenter trials is needed.

conclusionsOptimizing patients' expectations pre-surgery helps to improve outcome 6 months after treatment. This implies that making use of placebo mechanisms has the potential to improve long-term outcome of highly invasive medical interventions. Further studies are warranted to generalize this approach to other fields of medicine.

trial registrationEthical approval for the study was obtained from the IRB of the Medical School, University of Marburg, and the trial was registered at ( NCT01407055 ) on July 25, 2011.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28069021
PMCPMC5223324
OpenAlexW2569106442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.