Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28069002›Full record

ArticleBMC international health and human rights2017

Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe.

Webster Mavhu, Karin Hatzold, Getrude Ncube, Shamiso Fernando, Collin Mangenah, Kumbirai Chatora, Roy Dhlamini, Owen Mugurungi, Ismail Ticklay, Frances M Cowan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC international health and human rights, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Facilitators and barriers to voluntary medical male circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy in Kavango East, Namibia.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Webster MavhuCentre for Sexual Health & HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), 9 Monmouth Road Avondale West, Harare, Zimbabwe. wmavhu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-4398
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Getrude NcubeMinistry of Health & Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Shamiso FernandoCentre for Sexual Health & HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), 9 Monmouth Road Avondale West, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Collin MangenahCentre for Sexual Health & HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), 9 Monmouth Road Avondale West, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kumbirai ChatoraPopulation Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Roy DhlaminiPopulation Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Owen MugurungiMinistry of Health & Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Ismail TicklayUniversity of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Frances M CowanCentre for Sexual Health & HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), 9 Monmouth Road Avondale West, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research · ZWMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWUniversity of Zimbabwe · ZW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly infant male circumcision (EIMC) has been identified as a key HIV prevention intervention. Exploring the decision-making process for adoption of EIMC for HIV prevention among parents and other key stakeholders is critical for designing effective demand creation interventions to maximize uptake, roll out and impact in preventing HIV. This paper describes key players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process.

methodsTwo complementary qualitative studies explored hypothetical and actual acceptability of EIMC in Zimbabwe. The first study (conducted 2010) explored hypothetical acceptability of EIMC among parents and wider family through focus group discussions (FGDs, n = 24). The follow-up study (conducted 2013) explored actual acceptability of EIMC among parents through twelve in-depth interviews (IDIs), four FGDs and short telephone interviews with additional parents (n = 95). Short statements from the telephone interviews were handwritten. FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English. All data were thematically coded.

resultsStudy findings suggested that EIMC decision-making involved a discussion between the infant's parents. Male and female participants of all age groups acknowledged that the father had the final say. However, discussions around EIMC uptake suggested that the infant's mother could sometimes covertly influence the father's decision in the direction she favoured. Discussions also suggested that fathers who had undergone voluntary medical male circumcision were more likely to adopt EIMC for their sons, compared to their uncircumcised counterparts. Mothers-in-law/grandparents were reported to have considerable influence. Based on study findings, we describe key EIMC decision makers and attempt to illustrate alternative outcomes of their key actions and decisions around EIMC within the Zimbabwean context.

conclusionsThese complementary studies identified critical players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. Findings on who influences decisions regarding EIMC in the Zimbabwean context highlighted the need for EIMC demand generation interventions to target fathers, mothers, grandmothers, other family members and the wider community.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCircumcision, MaleFathersFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedParentsQualitative ResearchDecision-makingEarly infant male circumcisionInterventionsQualitativeZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID28069002
PMCPMC5223435
OpenAlexW2570874621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.