Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28068918›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in Italy.

Francesco Napolitano, Paola Napolitano, Italo Francesco Angelillo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Disparities in Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Europe.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco NapolitanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Paola NapolitanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Italo Francesco AngelilloDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy. italof.angelillo@unina2.it.
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this study were to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards seasonal influenza and its vaccination among pregnant women.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was carried out among a sample of women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy in Italy.

resultsThe 64.2% of the sample knew that the influenza is more dangerous for pregnant women. Women of older age, Italian, and who had a pregnancy at high-risk were more likely to have this knowledge. This knowledge was lower among women with none, primary or secondary school education. The majority of the respondents considered the vaccine not very useful during pregnancy. Those younger, unmarried, who knew that influenza is more dangerous for pregnant women, who knew that the vaccine could protect them, who reported a higher self-rated health status, and who had received information about influenza and its vaccination were more likely to have a positive attitude toward the usefulness of influenza vaccination in pregnancy. Women with secondary school education and with more than one child revealed a lower perception. Only 9.7% had received the vaccine and 21.4% of those unvaccinated would be willing to receive it. This positive attitude was higher among women with one child, who knew that the vaccine could protect them against the influenza, and who have a positive attitude toward the usefulness of the vaccination during pregnancy.

conclusionsHealth educational programs are needed to improve the knowledge about seasonal influenza and vaccination rate in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesItalyPregnancyPregnant PeopleSeasonsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesBehaviorsCross-sectional surveyItalyPregnant womenSeasonal influenzaVaccination

Identifiers

PMID28068918
PMCPMC5223411
OpenAlexW2568081655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.