Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28068906›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2017

CHERISH (collaboration for hospitalised elders reducing the impact of stays in hospital): protocol for a multi-site improvement program to reduce geriatric syndromes in older inpatients.

Alison M Mudge, Merrilyn D Banks, Adrian G Barnett, Irene Blackberry, Nicholas Graves, Theresa Green, Gillian Harvey, Ruth E Hubbard, Sharon K Inouye, Sue Kurrle and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Use of the i-PARIHS framework in nutrition and dietetics research and practice: A citation analysis of the literature and case studies.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Delirium.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison M MudgeRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia. Alison.Mudge@health.qld.gov.au.
Merrilyn D BanksRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Adrian G BarnettInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Irene BlackberryJohn Richards Initiative, Australian Institute of Primary Care and Ageing, La Trobe University, Albury-Wodonga, Australia.
Nicholas GravesInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Theresa GreenSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Gillian HarveyUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Ruth E HubbardCentre for Research in Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sharon K InouyeHarvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, USA.
Sue KurrleCognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kwang LimMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Prue McRaeRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Nancye M PeelCentre for Research in Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jessica SunaRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Adrienne M YoungRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUHebrew SeniorLife · USLa Trobe University · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

K07 Leadership GrantK07AG041835 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI INOUYE, SHARON K. · 2013 to 2017
$656k
NIA NIH HHS K07 AG041835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder inpatients are at risk of hospital-associated geriatric syndromes including delirium, functional decline, incontinence, falls and pressure injuries. These contribute to longer hospital stays, loss of independence, and death. Effective interventions to reduce geriatric syndromes remain poorly implemented due to their complexity, and require an organised approach to change care practices and systems. Eat Walk Engage is a complex multi-component intervention with structured implementation, which has shown reduced geriatric syndromes and length of stay in pilot studies at one hospital. This study will test effectiveness of implementing Eat Walk Engage using a multi-site cluster randomised trial to inform transferability of this intervention.

methodsA hybrid study design will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation strategy of Eat Walk Engage in a real-world setting. A multisite cluster randomised study will be conducted in 8 medical and surgical wards in 4 hospitals, with one ward in each site randomised to implement Eat Walk Engage (intervention) and one to continue usual care (control). Intervention wards will be supported to develop and implement locally tailored strategies to enhance early mobility, nutrition, and meaningful activities. Resources will include a trained, mentored facilitator, audit support, a trained healthcare assistant, and support by an expert facilitator team using the i-PARIHS implementation framework. Patient outcomes and process measures before and after intervention will be compared between intervention and control wards. Primary outcomes are any hospital-associated geriatric syndrome (delirium, functional decline, falls, pressure injuries, new incontinence) and length of stay. Secondary outcomes include discharge destination; 30-day mortality, function and quality of life; 6 month readmissions; and cost-effectiveness. Process measures including patient interviews, activity mapping and mealtime audits will inform interventions in each site and measure improvement progress. Factors influencing the trajectory of implementation success will be monitored on implementation wards. DISCUSSION: Using a hybrid design and guided by an explicit implementation framework, the CHERISH study will establish the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and transferability of a successful pilot program for improving care of older inpatients, and identify features that support successful implementation.

trial registrationACTRN12615000879561 registered prospectively 21/8/2015.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisDeliriumFeeding BehaviorFemaleHospitalizationHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleNutritional StatusPatient DischargePilot ProjectsAcute careAgedDeliriumElderlyFacilitationFallsFunctional declineHospital care organisationHospitalisationImplementationImplementation frameworkIncontinencePressure injuriesPressure ulcerUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID28068906
PMCPMC5223473
OpenAlexW2569852507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.