Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28068905›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2017

G-computation of average treatment effects on the treated and the untreated.

Aolin Wang, Roch A Nianogo, Onyebuchi A Arah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Aging with dual burdens: cross-national evidence on mortality among older Hispanic adults with diabetes and dementia.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toward New Directions in Human Biology: A Roadmap for Anthropological Causal Inference With Observational Data.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  10. Association between diabetes and heart failure after coronary artery bypass grafting: Danish register-based cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Model-based standardization using multiple imputation.BMC medical research methodology · 2024
    Article
  20. [Relationship Between Hearing Loss and Cognitive Function in Elderly Chinese People: A Study Based on Propensity Score Matching].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aolin WangDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA. aolinw@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3490-648X
Roch A NianogoDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Onyebuchi A ArahDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Statistics and Methods CoreR24HD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COSTA, DORA L · 2001 to 2016
$10.1M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
The impact of natural experiments on child obesity: A systems science approachR01HD072296 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PRELIP, MICHAEL LEE, WANG, MAY C · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072296NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAverage treatment effects on the treated (ATT) and the untreated (ATU) are useful when there is interest in: the evaluation of the effects of treatments or interventions on those who received them, the presence of treatment heterogeneity, or the projection of potential outcomes in a target (sub-) population. In this paper we illustrate the steps for estimating ATT and ATU using g-computation implemented via Monte Carlo simulation.

methodsTo obtain marginal effect estimates for ATT and ATU we used a three-step approach: fitting a model for the outcome, generating potential outcome variables for ATT and ATU separately, and regressing each potential outcome variable on treatment intervention.

resultsThe estimates for ATT, ATU and average treatment effect (ATE) were of similar magnitude, with ATE being in between ATT and ATU as expected. In our illustrative example, the effect (risk difference [RD]) of a higher education on angina among the participants who indeed have at least a high school education (ATT) was -0.019 (95% CI: -0.040, -0.007) and that among those who have less than a high school education in India (ATU) was -0.012 (95% CI: -0.036, 0.010).

conclusionsThe g-computation algorithm is a powerful way of estimating standardized estimates like the ATT and ATU. Its use should be encouraged in modern epidemiologic teaching and practice.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAngina PectorisComputer SimulationEducational StatusHumansMonte Carlo MethodTreatment OutcomeAverage treatment effects on the treated (ATT)Average treatment effects on the untreated (ATU)G-computationParametric g-formulaResamplingSimulation

Identifiers

PMID28068905
PMCPMC5223318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.