Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28068394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Prediction of Small for Gestational Age Infants in Healthy Nulliparous Women Using Clinical and Ultrasound Risk Factors Combined with Early Pregnancy Biomarkers.

Lesley M E McCowan, John M D Thompson, Rennae S Taylor, Philip N Baker, Robyn A North, Lucilla Poston, Claire T Roberts, Nigel A B Simpson, James J Walker, Jenny Myers and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CaBiomedical reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lesley M E McCowanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
John M D ThompsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rennae S TaylorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Philip N BakerLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Robyn A NorthDivision of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom.
Lucilla PostonDivision of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom.
Claire T RobertsRobinson Research Institute and School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Nigel A B SimpsonSection of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical & Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
James J WalkerSection of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical & Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Jenny MyersMaternal and Fetal Heath Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Louise C KennyINFANT (The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College, Cork, Ireland.
SCOPE consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMost small for gestational age pregnancies are unrecognised before birth, resulting in substantial avoidable perinatal mortality and morbidity. Our objective was to develop multivariable prediction models for small for gestational age combining clinical risk factors and biomarkers at 15±1 weeks' with ultrasound parameters at 20±1 weeks' gestation.

methodsData from 5606 participants in the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) cohort study were divided into Training (n = 3735) and Validation datasets (n = 1871). The primary outcomes were All-SGA (small for gestational age with birthweight <10th customised centile), Normotensive-SGA (small for gestational age with a normotensive mother) and Hypertensive-SGA (small for gestational age with an hypertensive mother). The comparison group comprised women without the respective small for gestational age phenotype. Multivariable analysis was performed using stepwise logistic regression beginning with clinical variables, and subsequent additions of biomarker and then ultrasound (biometry and Doppler) variables. Model performance was assessed in Training and Validation datasets by calculating area under the curve.

results633 (11.2%) infants were All-SGA, 465(8.2%) Normotensive-SGA and 168 (3%) Hypertensive-SGA. Area under the curve (95% Confidence Intervals) for All-SGA using 15±1 weeks' clinical variables, 15±1 weeks' clinical+ biomarker variables and clinical + biomarkers + biometry /Doppler at 20±1 weeks' were: 0.63 (0.59-0.67), 0.64 (0.60-0.68) and 0.69 (0.66-0.73) respectively in the Validation dataset; Normotensive-SGA results were similar: 0.61 (0.57-0.66), 0.61 (0.56-0.66) and 0.68 (0.64-0.73) with small increases in performance in the Training datasets. Area under the curve (95% Confidence Intervals) for Hypertensive-SGA were: 0.76 (0.70-0.82), 0.80 (0.75-0.86) and 0.84 (0.78-0.89) with minimal change in the Training datasets.

conclusionModels for prediction of small for gestational age, which combine biomarkers, clinical and ultrasound data from a cohort of low-risk nulliparous women achieved modest performance. Incorporation of biomarkers into the models resulted in no improvement in performance of prediction of All-SGA and Normotensive-SGA but a small improvement in prediction of Hypertensive-SGA. Our models currently have insufficient reliability for application in clinical practice however, they have potential utility in two-staged screening tests which include third trimester biomarkers and or fetal biometry.

Indexed as

BiomarkersParityUltrasonography, PrenatalFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, Small for Gestational AgePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy Trimester, ThirdPrognosisRisk FactorsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28068394
PMCPMC5221822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.