Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28068387›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Enhancing Targeted Genomic DNA Editing in Chicken Cells Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System.

Ling Wang, Likai Yang, Yijie Guo, Weili Du, Yajun Yin, Tao Zhang, Hongzhao Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Comparison of Multiple Strategies for Precision Transgene Knock-In inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Strategies for precise gene edits in mammalian cells.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Gene editing in birds takes flight.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling WangSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi SCI-TECH University, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Likai YangSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi SCI-TECH University, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Yijie GuoDepartment of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jitong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Weili DuSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi SCI-TECH University, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Yajun YinSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi SCI-TECH University, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Tao ZhangSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi SCI-TECH University, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Hongzhao LuSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi SCI-TECH University, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Shaanxi University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has enabled highly efficient genome targeted editing for various organisms. However, few studies have focused on CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-mediated chicken genome editing compared with mammalian genomes. The current study combined CRISPR with yeast Rad52 (yRad52) to enhance targeted genomic DNA editing in chicken DF-1 cells. The efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-induced targeted mutations in the chicken genome was increased to 41.9% via the enrichment of the dual-reporter surrogate system. In addition, the combined effect of CRISPR nuclease and yRad52 dramatically increased the efficiency of the targeted substitution in the myostatin gene using 50-mer oligodeoxynucleotides (ssODN) as the donor DNA, resulting in a 36.7% editing efficiency after puromycin selection. Furthermore, based on the effect of yRad52, the frequency of exogenous gene integration in the chicken genome was more than 3-fold higher than that without yRad52. Collectively, these results suggest that ssODN is an ideal donor DNA for targeted substitution and that CRISPR/Cas9 combined with yRad52 significantly enhances chicken genome editing. These findings could be extensively applied in other organisms.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGene TargetingGenomeAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesCell LineChickensGene ExpressionGene Knock-In TechniquesGene OrderGenes, ReporterHumansMutagenesisMyostatinMSTN protein, humanMyostatin

Identifiers

PMID28068387
PMCPMC5222187
OpenAlexW2571413046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.