Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28068350›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Genome-Wide Association Mapping and Genomic Selection for Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Forage Quality Traits.

Elisa Biazzi, Nelson Nazzicari, Luciano Pecetti, E Charles Brummer, Alberto Palmonari, Aldo Tava, Paolo Annicchiarico

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
27.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pearl millet a promising fodder crop for changing climate: a review.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Review
  12. Genomic prediction of resistance toEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Discovering new genes for alfalfa (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa BiazziCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions (CREA-FLC), Lodi, Italy.
Nelson NazzicariCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions (CREA-FLC), Lodi, Italy.
Luciano PecettiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions (CREA-FLC), Lodi, Italy.
E Charles BrummerPlant Breeding Center, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Alberto PalmonariDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Aldo TavaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions (CREA-FLC), Lodi, Italy.
Paolo AnnicchiaricoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions (CREA-FLC), Lodi, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-1035
Cereal Research Centre · ITPlant (United States) · USUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic progress for forage quality has been poor in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), the most-grown forage legume worldwide. This study aimed at exploring opportunities for marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection of forage quality traits based on breeding values of parent plants. Some 154 genotypes from a broadly-based reference population were genotyped by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), and phenotyped for leaf-to-stem ratio, leaf and stem contents of protein, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL), and leaf and stem NDF digestibility after 24 hours (NDFD), of their dense-planted half-sib progenies in three growing conditions (summer harvest, full irrigation; summer harvest, suspended irrigation; autumn harvest). Trait-marker analyses were performed on progeny values averaged over conditions, owing to modest germplasm × condition interaction. Genomic selection exploited 11,450 polymorphic SNP markers, whereas a subset of 8,494 M. truncatula-aligned markers were used for a genome-wide association study (GWAS). GWAS confirmed the polygenic control of quality traits and, in agreement with phenotypic correlations, indicated substantially different genetic control of a given trait in stems and leaves. It detected several SNPs in different annotated genes that were highly linked to stem protein content. Also, it identified a small genomic region on chromosome 8 with high concentration of annotated genes associated with leaf ADL, including one gene probably involved in the lignin pathway. Three genomic selection models, i.e., Ridge-regression BLUP, Bayes B and Bayesian Lasso, displayed similar prediction accuracy, whereas SVR-lin was less accurate. Accuracy values were moderate (0.3-0.4) for stem NDFD and leaf protein content, modest for leaf ADL and NDFD, and low to very low for the other traits. Along with previous results for the same germplasm set, this study indicates that GBS data can be exploited to improve both quality traits (by genomic selection or MAS) and forage yield.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantGenomicsMedicago sativaMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID28068350
PMCPMC5222375
OpenAlexW2568119146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.