Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28068346›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

Mutation Accumulation in an Asexual Relative of Arabidopsis.

John T Lovell, Robert J Williamson, Stephen I Wright, John K McKay, Timothy F Sharbel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Relationships withinPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evolution of Transcriptomes in Early-Generation Hybrids of the ApomicticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in a warming world.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

John T LovellDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8938-1166
Robert J WilliamsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9732-0964
Stephen I WrightDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John K McKayDepartment of BioAgricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
Timothy F SharbelApomixis Research Group, Leibniz Institute for Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3450-2733
University of Toronto · CAColorado State University · USLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) · DEThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asexual populations experience weaker responses to natural selection, which causes deleterious mutations to accumulate over time. Additionally, stochastic loss of individuals free of deleterious mutations can lead to an irreversible increase in mutational load in asexuals (the "click" in Muller's Ratchet). Here we report on the genomic divergence and distribution of mutations across eight sympatric pairs of sexual and apomictic (asexual) Boechera (Brassicaceae) genotypes. We show that apomicts harbor a greater number of derived mutations than sympatric sexual genotypes. Furthermore, in phylogenetically constrained sites that are subject to contemporary purifying selection, the ancestral, conserved allele is more likely to be retained in sexuals than apomicts. These results indicate that apomictic lineages accumulate mutations at otherwise conserved sites more often than sexuals, and support the conclusion that deleterious mutation accumulation can be a powerful force in the evolution of asexual higher plants.

Indexed as

Mutation RateReproduction, AsexualBrassicaceaeEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantPhylogenySelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID28068346
PMCPMC5261742
OpenAlexW2570669030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.