ArticleJournal of neural engineering2017
Particle swarm optimization for programming deep brain stimulation arrays.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- The optimization of neuroprosthetic interfaces relying on biophysical and surrogate digital twins.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Multitarget neurostimulation of the deep brain: clinical opportunities, challenges, and emerging technologies.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Review
- From dawn till dusk: Time-adaptive bayesian optimization for neurostimulation.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- An optimization framework for targeted spinal cord stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Autonomous optimization of neuroprosthetic stimulation parameters that drive the motor cortex and spinal cord outputs in rats and monkeys.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Article
- Modeling extracellular stimulation of retinal ganglion cells: theoretical and practical aspects.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Patient-specific structural connectivity informs outcomes of responsive neurostimulation for temporal lobe epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2022Article
- Automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters for modulating neuroimaging-based targets.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
- Past, Present, and Future of Deep Brain Stimulation: Hardware, Software, Imaging, Physiology and Novel Approaches.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: Update on Long-Term Outcomes, Target Considerations and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Semi-automated approaches to optimize deep brain stimulation parameters in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Computational investigation of the impact of deep brain stimulation contact size and shape on neural selectivity.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Optogenetics, Ethical Issues Affecting DBS Research, Neuromodulatory Approaches for Depression, Adaptive Neurostimulation, and Emerging DBS Technologies.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Real-Time Optimization of Retinal Ganglion Cell Spatial Activity in Response to Epiretinal Stimulation.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021Article
- Orientation-selective and directional deep brain stimulation in swine assessed by functional MRI at 3T.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Structural connectivity predicts clinical outcomes of deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Kilohertz waveforms optimized to produce closed-state Na+ channel inactivation eliminate onset response in nerve conduction block.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Comparing Current Steering Technologies for Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Using a Computational Model That Incorporates Heterogeneous Tissue Properties.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2020Article
- Interactive computation and visualization of deep brain stimulation effects using Duality.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy relies on both precise neurosurgical targeting and systematic optimization of stimulation settings to achieve beneficial clinical outcomes. One recent advance to improve targeting is the development of DBS arrays (DBSAs) with electrodes segmented both along and around the DBS lead. However, increasing the number of independent electrodes creates the logistical challenge of optimizing stimulation parameters efficiently. APPROACH: Solving such complex problems with multiple solutions and objectives is well known to occur in biology, in which complex collective behaviors emerge out of swarms of individual organisms engaged in learning through social interactions. Here, we developed a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to program DBSAs using a swarm of individual particles representing electrode configurations and stimulation amplitudes. Using a finite element model of motor thalamic DBS, we demonstrate how the PSO algorithm can efficiently optimize a multi-objective function that maximizes predictions of axonal activation in regions of interest (ROI, cerebellar-receiving area of motor thalamus), minimizes predictions of axonal activation in regions of avoidance (ROA, somatosensory thalamus), and minimizes power consumption. MAIN
resultsThe algorithm solved the multi-objective problem by producing a Pareto front. ROI and ROA activation predictions were consistent across swarms (<1% median discrepancy in axon activation). The algorithm was able to accommodate for (1) lead displacement (1 mm) with relatively small ROI (⩽9.2%) and ROA (⩽1%) activation changes, irrespective of shift direction; (2) reduction in maximum per-electrode current (by 50% and 80%) with ROI activation decreasing by 5.6% and 16%, respectively; and (3) disabling electrodes (n = 3 and 12) with ROI activation reduction by 1.8% and 14%, respectively. Additionally, comparison between PSO predictions and multi-compartment axon model simulations showed discrepancies of <1% between approaches. SIGNIFICANCE: The PSO algorithm provides a computationally efficient way to program DBS systems especially those with higher electrode counts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.